MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389197625 · doi:10.2989/16073606.2023.2279275

Argument estimates associated with meromorphic close-to-starlike and Bazilević functions

2023· article· en· W4389197625 on OpenAlexaff
Nak Eun Cho, Inhwa Kim, H. M. Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaestiones Mathematicae · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeromorphic functionArgument (complex analysis)MathematicsUnit diskObject (grammar)Pure mathematicsUnit (ring theory)Subject (documents)Analytic functionMathematics Subject ClassificationAlgebra over a fieldArtificial intelligenceMathematics educationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The object of the present paper is to derive some argument properties associated with meromorphic close-to-starlike and Bazilević functions in the punctured open unit disk. Furthermore, we investigate integral-preserving properties in a sector with some special cases of the main results presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaestiones MathematicaeSame topicAnalytic and geometric function theoryFrench-language works237,207