Multiple Stock Prediction Based on Linear and Non-linear Machine Learning Regression Methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In contemporary times, the pressing issue of global environmental pollution has prompted the exploration of alternative energy sources by various industries, aiming to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts caused by traditional energy production. Correspondingly, investors in the financial market have increasingly redirected their capital towards the new energy sector. Within this context, the present research endeavors to employ machine learning techniques for the prediction of Tesla's stock price. This study leverages multiple linear regression, polynomial regression, and lag models to construct models based on the datasets of TSLA, MPC, and UNG stock prices spanning the period of 2019-2020. By discerning potential patterns among these variables, the objective is to anticipate the future trajectory of TSLA stock price. According to machine learning methods, Tesla's stock price can be predicted, and the daily price of Tesla is influenced by the opening price, high price, low price and trading volume of the stock on that day. In addition, the share prices of energy companies related to Tesla also have an impact on Tesla's share price on that day. Specifically, Tesla's stock price is influenced by Natural Gas Company (UNG), which has an opposite relationship. Although common sense economics says that the crude oil market will be closely related to the new energy market. However, the results of this study demonstrated that Tesla's stock price is less influenced by Crude Oil Company (MPC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".