MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389205234 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.181108

Enhancing Urban Sustainability by Integrating MCDM and Model of GIS Spatial Analysis in Al-Nasiriyah Heritage Center Development

2023· article· en· W4389205234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityMultiple-criteria decision analysisCenter (category theory)Environmental planningSustainable developmentEnvironmental resource managementGeographic information systemGeographyEngineeringEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingOperations researchPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various countries of the world endeavor to achieve a new paradigm of sustainability by preserving their heritage and history and avoid the risk of old process preservation.Therefore, this article adopts several concepts for investigating heritage areas and then builds a model based on spatial analysis using GIS.So, the main problem this article addresses is that planning does not rely on appropriate mechanisms for preserving the heritage area of Al-Nasiriyah in Dhi-Qar Governorate, Iraq, which has resulted in erosion and destruction of that area.Consequently, the article aims to determine the optimal process for the rehabilitation to the heritage city center, using spatial analysis mechanisms and to achieve urban sustainability.To do this, the article first discusses various countries' experiences in the field of heritage conservation to understand successful principles for implementing the new sustainable paradigm.Subsequently, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to calibrate and assign weights to the analysis mechanism.This process is based on the most prominent elements that depend on land uses and necessary services in the spatial analysis.After analyzing eight indicators, a consistency ratio of 0.47 was obtained, which is the acceptable excitation range in AHP standards.Finally, the study built a model in GIS to determine the most suitable area for the development of any city with the same condition.Therefore, the spatial analysis and model process identified Zones 2 and 3 as the most suitable for development, with Zone 4 being the optimal choice according to the MCDM analysis to be selected as the first area for development.Thus, this can limit the process of erosion of the urban heritage fabric due to the encroachment of commercial use and the rise in the value of achieving cultural sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it