MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389206429 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15776

Physics-Informed Diagnostic and Prognostic Models for Rolling Element Bearings Using Oil Debris Data

2023· dissertation· en· W4389206429 on OpenAlexaff
H. Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrognosticsSpallRacewayRolling-element bearingBearing (navigation)AdaptabilityEngineeringDebrisOil analysisComputer scienceMechanical engineeringReliability engineeringStructural engineeringFinite element methodArtificial intelligenceVibrationMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rolling element bearings are susceptible to rolling contact fatigue failure. This poses challenges in industrial applications like wind turbines and aircraft. To address this challenge, the thesis constructs diagnostic and prognostic models due to spalling in the inner raceway. This is achieved by integrating real-time oil debris data and a comprehensive understanding of the underlying bearing degradation mechanisms. The diagnostic model incorporates spall physical information, a heuristic "Kneedle" algorithm and a Random Forest to determine the severity of the spall propagation. For prognostics, the author thoroughly evaluates the effectiveness of the particle filter and its variants. Subsequently, the enhanced version of the Auxiliary Particle Filter with Resample Move is deployed to estimate the remaining useful life. The paramount significance of this developed model lies in its adaptability to bearings of various sizes. This versatility ensures its applicability across various industrial contexts, thus offering an effective solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207