Mapping out COVID-19, Social Distancing, Pandemic in Juxtaposition with Sexual Desires Practices in a Gay Latino Immigrants Men [GLIM] Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19 reminded us of the fragility of human beings once humankind had felt they had mastered health, weather, and natural conditions in the world. For many generations, there was no memory of any pandemic close to our lived experience. During the pandemic, I was waiting to start the interviews for my research on Gay Latino immigrant men in Ontario, Canada. Because of COVID, my advisory committee accepted adding three questions about COVID to be analyzed along with the semi-structured questionnaire focused on sexual health practices among Latino immigrants in interracial sexual/romantic relationships. The findings result in the understanding of the role of sex on Gay Latino men and the strategies they developed to somehow deal with the lockdowns, social distancing, the risk of getting infected with COVID-19, and simultaneously satisfy their sexual and romantic needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it