FINANCIAL RESILIENCE IN THE QUARTER-LIFE CRISIS PHASE GROUP: ANALYSIS OF THE ROLES OF FINANCIAL LITERACY, FINANCIAL PLANNING, SELF-EFFICACY AND INCOME
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Financial Resilience is the ability to withstand and recover when faced with challenging economic conditions. This study aims to examine the influence of financial literacy, financial planning, self-efficacy, and income on the financial resilience of individuals in the quarter-life crisis phase. The research employed a quantitative approach, and data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 3.0 software. A total of 255 respondents were obtained through purposive sampling and online questionnaires. The research findings conclude that financial literacy and financial planning positively and significantly impact financial resilience. However, self-efficacy and income do not positively influence financial resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it