MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389208722 · doi:10.1017/s1537592723002177

The Political Regulation Wave: A Case of How Local Incentives Systematically Shape Air Quality in China. By Shiran Victoria Shen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 161p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper. - Local Politics and Social Policy in China: Let Some Get Healthy First. By Kerry E. Ratigan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 200p. $99.99 cloth.

2023· article· en· W4389208722 on OpenAlexaff
Manfred Elfström

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives on Politics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncentiveChinaPoliticsPolitical scienceEconomic historyPolitical economySociologyEconomicsLawMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Political Regulation Wave: A Case of How Local Incentives Systematically Shape Air Quality in China. By Shiran Victoria Shen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 161p. $99.99 cloth. - Volume 21 Issue 4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives on PoliticsSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207