MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389219072 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-174301

A Feasibility Study Evaluating Von Willebrand Factor in Patients with Gastrointestinal Angiodysplasia

2023· article· en· W4389219072 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas L.J. Chornenki, Julie Grabell, Mackenzie Bowman, David Good, Lawrence Hookey, Paula James

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngiodysplasiaMedicineVon Willebrand factorCapsule endoscopyGastroenterologyInternal medicineVon Willebrand diseaseGastrointestinal bleedingPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Abnormalities of von Willebrand Factor (VWF), such as those found in von Willebrand Disease (VWD) are associated with the development of abnormal blood vessels known as angiodysplasia. Angiodysplasia occurs primarily in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, particularly the small bowel. Among patients with VWD, angiodysplasia is significantly overrepresented as a cause of GI bleeding and occurs in all VWD subtypes although it is reported more frequently in those with loss of the high molecular weight multimer of VWF. Recent studies have demonstrated more than a third of patients with VWD and GI bleeding have angiodysplasia when systematically assessed with Video Capsule Endoscopy (VCE) to examine the small bowel. Given the relationship between angiodysplasia and VWD our objective was to assess the feasibility of evaluating patients with GI angiodysplasia for abnormalities of VWF. Methods: We undertook a prospective single center pilot study to assess patients over the age of 18 with GI angiodysplasia for underlying abnormalities of VWF. Patients were identified based on angiodysplasia being present on a VCE study. Patients who consented to enrollment completed a self-administered bleeding assessment tool (BAT) as well as baseline demographic data. VWF testing included VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF functional assay (VWF:GPIbM), Factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), and VWF pro-peptide (VWFpp) levels. Results: After reviewing 190 consecutive VCE studies performed at our institution between April 2021 and April 2023, we identified 50 patients who had capsule endoscopies demonstrating angiodysplasia of the GI tract. Thirteen of these patients consented to enrollment in the study. The bleeding histories of included patients are detailed in Table 1 along with their baseline clinical, laboratory, and demographic data. Two patients endorsed lifelong bleeding symptoms and three reported a significant family history of bleeding - all in a female relative. ISTH-BAT scores ranged from 0 to 18 with a median score of 2. Since our population is older than other studies that report on bleeding scores, we considered an abnormal bleeding score to be >6 as recent evidence indicates normal BAT scores increase over time. Five patients (38.6%) in our study had an ISTH-BAT abnormal bleeding score. VWF levels were assessed (Table 1) and one patient aged 88 years old with a significant family and lifelong history of bleeding received a new diagnosis of Type 2A VWD. Severe iron deficiency anemia requiring ongoing IV iron was diagnosed in two patients. Conclusion: In our feasibility study, we demonstrated a feasible protocol for recruitment of patients with GI angiodysplasia for clinical and laboratory testing of VWF. A significant proportion of our patients (38.6%) had abnormal bleeding scores and one patient had an underlying Type 2A VWD diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→