Based on machine learning model for prediction of CO2 adsorption of synthetic zeolite in two-step solid waste treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rising environmental issues caused by carbon dioxide emissions and accumulation of industrial solid waste accelerate the development of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS), especially the technology using industrial solid waste as a raw material to prepare environmentally friendly and sustainable porous materials to capture CO2. This study developed four models including support vector regression(SVR), multivariate adaptive regression spline(Mars), random forest(RF), and gradient boosting machine(GBM) based on 762 CO2 adsorption datasets of zeolites synthesized from five different industrial solid waste materials to predict the CO2 adsorption capacity and analyze impact of various factors on CO2 adsorption performance during synthesis and adsorption processes. The results suggested that gradient boosting machine(GBM) and the support vector regression(SVR) have good accuracy and generalization performance. The R2 of the model reached 0.99 and 0.96 respectively, which is in good agreement with the laboratory data. In general, the specific surface area(S) and adsorption pressure(P) during the adsorption process of zeolite have a great influence on the final adsorption performance. The correlation between the specific surface area(S) and the hydrothermal reaction temperature(T2) is the largest, and its Pearson Correlation Coefficient is 0.61. This study paved a new approach for the accumulation treatment of industrial solid waste and low-carbon industry via statistical analysis and machine learning method, which is beneficial to environmental protection and sustainable development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".