MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389220160 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-182093

Longitudinal Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Using KAPA HyperCap Design Share Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (KAPA HyperCap DS NHL) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Panel

2023· article· en· W4389220160 on OpenAlexaff
Vladislava O. Melnikova, Clara Bermejo, Richard Chien, Parul Agarwal, Alexandra Markus, Bowdoin Su, Renee Stokowski, Ronald McCord, Alex F. Herrera, Laurie H. Sehn

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphomaMinimal residual diseaseOncologyMedicineInternal medicineDNA sequencingDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLiquid biopsyCancerBiologyGeneLeukemiaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Studies have shown that dynamic changes in lymphoma ctDNA levels are associated with patient outcomes and that monitoring lymphoma ctDNA may help identify patients who are at risk of refractory disease or relapse. NGS panels can successfully identify patient-specific tumor reporter variants in plasma specimens using a tissue-naïve approach that avoids limitations of patient tissue availability. Recently, using the AVENIO Oncology Assay (AOA) NHL Test* validated by the Roche Molecular CAP/CLIA Laboratory, a pre-specified analysis plan using samples from ~800 DLBCL patients from the POLARIX study validated ctDNA as an early prognostic biomarker (Herrera et al., Blood 2022). To further support clinical research on early molecular response (EMR) to treatment and minimal residual disease (MRD) in NHL, we introduce a KAPA HyperCap DS NHL panel designed to cover 100% of the target regions in the AOA NHL Test used for the POLARIX study. We describe the NGS workflow and bioinformatics analysis suitable for identification and monitoring of ctDNA using a tissue-naïve approach. We further describe performance characterization studies and feasibility of ctDNA detection using plasma specimens from patients with DLBCL. Methods KAPA HyperCap DS NHL panel covers coding and/or untranslated regions of 383 genes, plus additional intergenic regions, for a total of 341 Kb. This panel is used in combination with KAPA HyperCap workflows and KAPA reagents on Illumina® platforms, to sequence plasma cfDNA and matched genomic (g)DNA to identify tumor-specific single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and monitor the dynamics of ctDNA. ctDNA detection and monitoring are supported by open-source bioinformatics tools for a fully integrated MRD analysis solution. Contrived samples for workflow characterization were comprised of commercially available reference materials with known SNV allele frequencies (AF) mimicking cfDNA (SeraSeq® Complete Mutation Mix and Twist Pan-cancer Reference Standard), as well as pre-characterized healthy donor cfDNA. Clinically annotated DLBCL samples were characterized and serially diluted to demonstrate feasibility of longitudinal mutation analysis. Results Serially diluted cfDNA samples and high molecular weight gDNA samples were used to assess the performance of the plasma cfDNA and germline workflows. Library quality control metrics met the yield and size distribution criteria for sequencing. A median of 88 M raw reads were obtained across all libraries. De-duplication yielded a median coverage depth range from 5000-9100 across samples. Median on-target rate (% selected bases) was between 74% and 80%. Average error rate was between 0.00024 or 0.00031 mismatches/read depth. 9 and 3 variants were detected after germline and blocklist filtering in the two commercial reference samples. Variant calling sensitivity was 100% across replicates at 5, 1 and 0.5% AF. In the serial dilution analysis, ctDNA was detected in all replicates at 5, 0.1 and 0.05% mean AF. For samples at 0.01% mean AF, ctDNA detection sensitivity was 83%. Initial data demonstrate that 131 SNV reporters were detected at 23% mean AF in a plasma sample from a treatment-naïve DLBCL patient. 4 SNV reporters were detected at 1.9% mean AF in a plasma sample from an immunochemotherapy-treated DLBCL patient. After 10x and 500x dilution, ctDNA positivity was accurately called at 2.3% and 0.05% mean AF levels for the patient with 131 reporters, and at 0.19% mean AF level for the patient with 4 reporters (Monte Carlo p-value <0.0001). Conclusion The use of KAPA HyperCap DS NHL panel with KAPA HyperCap workflows and open-source bioinformatics tools enables the detection and monitoring of ctDNA for NHL research applications. In contrived samples, variants were detected with high reproducibility at AF as low as 0.05% and with good reproducibility at AF of 0.01%. For a DLBCL patient with 131 SNV reporters in plasma, ctDNA was detectable down to 0.05% mean AF levels, while for a DLBCL patient with 4 SNV reporters, ctDNA was detectable down to 0.19% mean AF levels, demonstrating that sensitivity of Monte Carlo-based ctDNA detection depends on the number of reporter variants. *AVENIO Oncology Assay (AOA) NHL Test and KAPA HyperCap Design Share panels are for Research Use Only, not for use in diagnostic procedures. AVENIO and KAPA are trademarks of Roche. All other product names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207