MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389220419 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-179596

Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitor Use in the Setting of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Impact on Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Levels and Thrombosis Risk

2023· article· en· W4389220419 on OpenAlexaff
Naseema Gangat, Omer Karrar, Maymona Abdelmagid, Moazah Iftikhar, Kaaren K. Reichard, Natasha Szuber, Ayalew Tefferi

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicinePolycythemia veraEssential thrombocythemiaGastroenterologyMyelofibrosisAnagrelideMyeloproliferative neoplasmHematocritThrombosisDiabetes mellitusSurgeryEndocrinologyBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2I) are FDA-approved for diabetes mellitus, heart failure and chronic renal disease. Clinical trials on their anti-diabetic and cardiorenal protective effects showed an association with erythrocytosis. We have previously reported on the benign nature of SGLT-2I associated JAK2-unmutated erythrocytosis ( Blood 2021). Recently, we described the same phenomenon in the setting of a previously unrecognized myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), which led to unmasking of underlying MPN and thrombosis in 3 (33%) of 9 informative cases ( AJH 2023). The main objective of the current study was to assess the erythropoietic and thrombotic impact of SGLT-2I therapy in patients with a well-established MPN diagnosis, prior to treatment initiation. Methods: The Mayo Clinic MPN database was queried to identify patients prescribed SGLT2-I after diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) or myelofibrosis (MF). Baseline Hgb/Hct at SGLT-2I initiation, peak Hgb/Hct, absolute change in Hgb/Hct levels, and thrombosis during treatment were recorded. Results: SGLT-2I use in essential thrombocythemia Eleven patients with ET (median age; 72 years, 55% males, 73% JAK2 mutated, 64% with thrombosis history) received SGLT-2I. Active treatments included aspirin ( n=10), cytoreductive therapy ( n=10) and systemic anticoagulation ( n=4). All 11 patients displayed increase in Hgb/Hct following SGLT-2I treatment. Baseline median (range) values for Hgb/Hct were 12.8 g/dL (9.5-14.9)/38.9% (30.3-44.6); median (range) peak Hgb/Hct levels during SGLT-2I therapy, were 14.5 g/dL (11-16.4)/44.4% (34.8-51.1), with median (range) increase in Hgb/Hct of 1.5 g/dL (1-4)/5.1% (2.6-13.8); 2 patients (18%), exceeded the proposed ICC Hgb/Hct diagnostic threshold for PV (Patient 7 and 8) (Figure 1). JAK2 mutation/VAF (p=0.54/ 0.20), or serum erythropoietin (Epo) (p=0.48) did not correlate with changes in Hgb/Hct levels. One patient experienced thrombosis, despite treatment with hydroxyurea and aspirin and Hgb/Hct levels below the threshold of concern (11.4 g/dL/37.7%). SGLT-2I use in polycythemia vera Nine patients with PV (median age 74 years, 66% males, JAK2 median VAF 14%, two patients with thrombosis history) received SGLT-2I. Concomitant treatments included aspirin ( n=9), cytoreductive therapy ( n=8), and systemic anticoagulation ( n=3). Phlebotomy intensity, defined as the number of phlebotomies, six months prior to and after SGLT-2I initiation, ranged from 0-3 and 0-12, respectively. Documented Hgb/Hct levels showed an increase in all 9 cases with baseline median (range) values for Hgb 14.1 g/dL (10.5-15.9) and Hct 42.7% (33.3-49.2) and peak median (range) values for Hgb/Hct, 15.4 g/dL (11.2-19.9)/46.7% (35.9-63.3). JAK2 VAF (p=0.85), and serum Epo (p=0.43) did not correlate with increase in Hct. Figure 2 highlights five patients (56%) with Hct exceeding 45% while on SGLT-2I; two patients (22%) had increased phlebotomy requirements; 6-month pre/post SGLT-2I phlebotomies for patient 5 and 9 were 3 and 6, and 0 and 12, respectively. Patient 9, experienced thrombosis in the context of uncontrolled Hgb/Hct level at 19.9 g/dl/63.3% and absence of cytoreductive therapy. SGLT-2I use in myelofibrosis Eight patients with myelofibrosis (primary 6, post-ET 2; median age 71 years; 50% males; 63% JAK2 mutated; MIPSS-70 2.0 int/high 6; on ruxolitinib 4),received SGLT-2I. Baseline median (range) values for Hgb/Hct were 10.6 g/dL (8.2-14.7)/27.5% (33.8-45.9); two (25%) patients displayed anemia with Hgb 8-10 g/dl. Peak median (range) values for Hgb/Hct were 11.5 g/dL (10.2-16.1)/35.3% (31.8-49.8), with median (range) baseline increase in Hgb/Hct of 1.6 g/dL (0.7-3.8)/4.3% (1-7.5). Patient 2 and 4 with baseline Hgb 8.2 g/dl and 9.4 g/dl, and not receiving ruxolitinib, had Hgb increase of 2 g/dl and 1 g/dl, respectively (Figure 3). One thrombotic event occurred during therapy with Hgb/Hct level of 11.6 g/dl/37.3%. Conclusion: The current study suggests that SGLT-2I therapy in MPN patients leads to increase in Hgb/Hct levels, regardless of disease subtype, and in some cases surpass the PV diagnosis and thrombosis risk thresholds. These observations mandate increased awareness to secure patient safety and diagnostic accuracy. The erythropoietic effect of SGLT-2I in MF suggests its potential use for MF-associated anemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207