MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389221188 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-189631

Assessment of ISTH-BAT Scores in a Primary Care Clinic Population of Menstruating Adolescents

2023· article· en· W4389221188 on OpenAlexaff
Adebimpe Adelaja, Joseph Stanek, Veronica H. Flood, Paula James, Sara K. Vesely, Sarah H. O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMedicinePediatricsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Accurate assessment of bleeding severity is critical for timely diagnosis and appropriate management of inherited bleeding disorders. To achieve standardized and reliable evaluation, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) developed the Bleeding Assessment Tool (BAT). The ISTH-BAT is a comprehensive questionnaire designed to systematically evaluate bleeding symptoms in both children and adults. A crucial aspect of utilizing the ISTH-BAT in clinical practice is determining the normal range of bleeding scores in the general population. Defining this baseline aids in distinguishing abnormal bleeding tendencies from variations within the healthy population. The ISTH-BAT Merging Project established a normal range of BAT scores for children age <18 years as 0-2 and for adult females age ≥18 years as 0-5. However, the normal range of BAT scores for adolescent females remains undetermined. This population is unique because they have undergone the bleeding challenge of menarche but are less likely to have experienced childbirth or multiple surgeries. Furthermore, while prior studies have shown age-related increases in BAT scores in individuals with von Willebrand Disease, there are limited data on the effect of aging on BAT scores in a healthy adolescent population. This study aims to determine the range of BAT scores in a diverse menstruating adolescent population, compare bleeding scores to published reference ranges from the ISTH-BAT Merging Project and assess potential age-related variations in BAT scores. Methods In an ongoing large population study, 10-20 year-old menstruating adolescents presenting for routine care are recruited from primary care clinics across Nationwide Children's Hospital (Columbus, OH, USA). Patients with a prior diagnosis of a bleeding disorder are excluded. The ISTH-BAT is administered by trained study personnel. Data analyses were completed using nonparametric methods such as Wilcoxon signed-rank or rank sum tests and Spearman's correlation. Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and compared to historical estimates. Results In a preliminary analysis of the first 150 participants, the median age was 15 years (IQR: 13-18). Participants represented a diverse range of backgrounds, with 69% of participants identifying as Black/African American, 19% as White, and 12% as other races. 94% identified as non-Hispanic, while 6% identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean BAT score was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.87-1.25), with scores ranging from 0-5. The data exhibited a non-normal distribution, with most scores concentrated at 0 or 1, accounting for 72% of the dataset. The mean BAT score is significantly higher than the ISTH-BAT Merging Project pediatric mean score of 0.34 (p<0.0001), but not significantly different from the adult female mean of 1.28 (p=0.99). When analyzed by age group, participants aged 10-17 years had a mean BAT score of 0.96, significantly higher than the published pediatric mean (p<0.0001) but similar to the published adult mean (p=0.99). Similarly, participants aged 18-20 years had a mean BAT score of 1.33. To assess if BAT score increased with age, we compared participants aged 10-14 years to adolescents 15-20 years, and identified a small, but significant increase in mean BAT score with age (p=0.001). Participants aged 10-14 years had a mean score of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.45-0.94), falling between the published pediatric and adult means, with no significant difference from either one (p=0.003 and p=0.99, respectively) (Figure 1). However, participants aged 15-20 had a mean BAT score of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.03-1.56), which remained significantly higher than the published pediatric mean (p<0.0001) but still showed no significant difference from the published adult mean (p=0.81). There was a weak, but statistically significant positive correlation between age and bleeding score, indicating that as age increases, bleeding scores tend to rise (Spearman's correlation r s= 0.21, p=0.001) (Figure 2). Similarly, a weak positive relationship exists between years post-menarche and bleeding score (r s=0.23, p=0.005). Conclusion This study provides insight on ISTH-BAT scores in a population of healthy menstruating adolescent females, suggesting that after the onset of menstruation, the adult female bleeding score range may be more suitable for adolescents than the pediatric range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicUrticaria and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207