MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389221384 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-178790

Long-Term Results from the Optic Trial: A Dose-Optimization Study of 3 Starting Doses of Ponatinib

2023· article· en· W4389221384 on OpenAlexaff
Jörge E. Cortes, Michael W. Deininger, Elza Lomaia, Beatriz Moiraghi, Soledad Undurraga, Carolina Pavlovsky, Charles Chuah, Tomasz Sacha, Jeffrey H. Lipton, James McCloskey, Andreas Hochhaus, Philippe Rousselot, Gianantonio Rosti, Hugues de Lavallade, Anna Turkina, Lori J. Maness, Moshe Talpaz, Michael J. Mauro, Vickie Lu, Alexander Vorog, Jane F. Apperley

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPonatinibMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointAdverse effectOncologyClinical trialDasatinibImatinibMyeloid leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ponatinib is a BCR::ABL1 TKI currently approved to potently inhibit all known native and single resistance mutation variants of BCR::ABL1, including T315I. The phase 2 OPTIC (Optimizing Ponatinib Treatment in CP-CML, NCT02467270; ongoing) trial is evaluating the efficacy and safety of ponatinib using a novel, response-based, dose-reduction strategy in patients with CP-CML whose disease is resistant to ≥2 TKIs or who harbor T315I. The response-based dosing strategy aims to optimize efficacy and improve the safety of ponatinib. Results from the OPTIC primary analysis and the 3-year update demonstrated an improved risk:benefit ratio for ponatinib starting with 45 mg/d, followed by dose reduction to 15 mg/d upon attaining ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS. We present for the first time the long-term 4-year update of efficacy and safety outcomes from the OPTIC trial. Methods: Patients with CP-CML resistant to ≥2 TKIs or with the BCR::ABL1T315I mutation were randomized to starting doses of ponatinib 45 mg, 30 mg, and 15 mg once daily. Upon achievement of ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS, doses were reduced to 15 mg in the 45-mg and 30-mg cohorts. The primary endpoint was ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS at 12 months; secondary endpoints included molecular response rates and safety outcomes, including arterial occlusive event (AOE) rates that were adjudicated prospectively by an independent review committee. Probabilities of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by 48 months were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 283 patients were randomized (45 mg/30 mg/15 mg: n=94/95/94). The median age was 48 years (range: 18‒81 years). As of May 8, 2023, 60.2% (56/93), 40.9% (38/93), and 39.6% (36/91) of patients in the 45-mg, 30-mg, and 15-mg cohorts, respectively, achieved ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS by 48 months ( Table). Median duration of response was not reached in any cohort. Of the patients with T315I mutations, 64.0% (16/25), 25.0% (5/20), and 15.8% (3/19) achieved ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS by 48 months versus 60.0% (30/50), 46.6% (27/58), and 45.3% (24/53) of patients without mutations and 56.3% (9/16), 40.0% (6/15), and 50.0% (9/18) of patients with other mutations in the 45-mg, 30-mg, and 15-mg cohorts, respectively. Of the patients who achieved ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS, 80.4% (45/56) and 71.1% (27/38) in the 45-mg and 30-mg cohorts, respectively, had dose reductions to 15 mg upon achieving ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS;11 patients did not reduce dose upon achieving ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS, including 6 dose reductions for adverse events (AEs; 3 maintained response), 2 discontinuations for AEs, and 3 lost to follow-up/other. Of the 86.7% (13/15) and 55.6% (5/9) of patients in the 45-mg and 30-mg cohorts who had dose re-escalations after loss of ≤1% BCR::ABL1ISresponse, 69.2% (9/13) and 80.0% (4/5) regained a ≤1% BCR::ABL1ISresponse, respectively. The median time to regain response after dose re-escalation among patients who achieved ≤1% BCR::ABL1ISresponse was 126 days (95% CI, 39-167) in the 45-mg cohort and was not applicable in the 30-mg cohort. Of the patients who did not regain response, 3 discontinued due to AE or progressive disease and 1 remains on treatment. Median PFS (72.5 months) was highest in the 45-mg cohort. Most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were thrombocytopenia (27.3%), neutropenia (17.7%), and hypertension (9.9%). Exposure-adjusted AOE rates (95% CI) were 3.87 (1.45, 6.30) in the 45-mg cohort, 3.66 (1.11, 6.20) in the 30-mg cohort, and 1.73 (0.02, 3.44) 15-mg cohort. Conclusions: Results from the first long-term analysis of the OPTIC study support ponatinib's robust long-term efficacy and manageable safety profile in patients with highly resistant CP-CML. These results are also consistent with previous analyses of the OPTIC trial and demonstrate that a ponatinib starting dose of 45 mg/d with reduction to 15 mg/d upon attainment of ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS continued to provide the optimal benefit:risk ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207