MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A050: Enhancing immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy by targeting neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1 signaling in immune resistant non-small cell lung cancer patients

2023· article· en· W4389227756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margaret Smith, Yuezhu Wang, Caroline B. Dixon, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Yin Liu, G.Charles Oliver, Lance D. Miller, Ümit Topaloĝlu, Michael D. Chan, Micahel Farris, Jing Su, Kathryn F. Mileham, Wencheng Li, Jason M. Grayson, Thomas Lycan, Fei Xing

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemCancer researchMedicineCancerReceptor tyrosine kinaseImmunotherapyLung cancerImmunologyReceptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The FDA’s approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in 2015 drastically changed the survival of late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, only about 30% of NSCLC patients respond to treatment, while the other 70% are immune resistant. Through an analysis of 424 NSCLC patients at Atrium Wake Forest, we have identified a loss-of-function mutation in Neurotrophic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 1 (NTRK1) as a biomarker for response to ICI. We hypothesize that by treating wild-type immune-resistant tumors with Entrectinib, we can mimic the effect of the mutation in NTRK1 and induce immune responses. Methods: To identify biomarkers, we collected genomic sequencing data and comprehensive clinical characteristics on 424 NSCLC patients who received ICI or chemo-ICI treatment at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. To determine the role of NTRK1 in vivo, we implanted LL/2-scramble (wild-type NTRK1) or LL/2-shNTRK1, which diminished NTRK1, into C57/B6 mice. The animals were injected with either IgG or Anti-PD1. To determine if we could mimic the effect of a mutation in NTRK1, C57/B6 mice were inoculated with LL2-wildtype NTRK1 and treated with either a) IgG, b) Entrectinib, c) Anti-PD-1, or d) Anti-PD-1 + Entrectinib. All in vivo experiments had tumor growth monitored, and a flow cytometry panel was performed at the endpoint to understand the immune responses. Bulk RNA-Sequencing was performed on cell cultures and tumors. Results: Mice given the LL/2-shNTRK1 responded to Anti-PD-1 treatment and had a significant increase in CD4+ stem-like effector T cells in the spleen and tumor-draining lymph nodes. Animals that were inoculated with the LL/2 cell lines and treated with Anti-PD-1 + Entrectinib also responded. Mice treated with Anti-PD-1 + Entrectinib were found to have a significant increase in CD4+ stem-like effector T cells as well. RNA-Sequencing revealed that in the mutant cell line LL/2-shNTRK1 and LL/2 tumors treated with Anti-PD-1 + Entrectinib, there was a significant upregulation of C3 production. Conclusion: Our studies demonstrate that the loss of NTRK1 function, through either genetic ablation or enzymatic inhibition combined with Anti-PD-1, provides a potent treatment for immune-resistant NSCLC tumors. Citation Format: Margaret R Smith, Yuezhu Wang, Caroline B. Dixon, Ralph D'Agostino, Yin Liu, George C. Oliver, Lance D Miller, Umit Topaloglu, Michael D Chan, Micahel Farris, Jing Su, Kathryn F Mileham, Wencheng Li, Jason M. Grayson, Thomas Lycan, Fei Xing. Enhancing immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy by targeting neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1 signaling in immune resistant non-small cell lung cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2023 Oct 1-4; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2023;11(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A050.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→