MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389228734 · doi:10.1094/pdis-10-23-2017-pdn

First Report of Charcoal Rot Caused by <i>Macrophomina phaseolina</i> on Dry Bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i>) in Western Canada

2023· article· en· W4389228734 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ahmed Abdelmagid, Yong Min Kim

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacrophomina phaseolinaPhaseolusBiologyCharcoalDry beanHorticultureBotanyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2021, several dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants at the mid-seed-fill growth stage displaying wilting, chlorosis of the leaves and reduced vigor were collected near the Pembina - Emerson Border of Manitoba, Canada and North Dakota, USA. When symptomatic plants were examined, gray to dark brown discoloration was observed on the lower stem and the roots. Afterwards, brown to black discoloration was noticed on stem and root sections. Root and lower stem pieces (1 to 2 cm) from affected plants were surface sterilized with 70 % ethanol, followed by 1% NaOCl, rinsed twice in sterilized water, air dried on sterilized filter papers, and placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with 1 mg/mL of streptomycin sulfate. The PDA plates were incubated at 28°C with 12 h light/12 h dark for 10 days. The growing hyphae were transferred using the hyphal tip method to new PDA plates. Growing cultures were initially hyaline and turned from light gray to dark brown or black with age. Abundant dark and spherical to oblong shaped sclerotia with an average diameter of 97.9 µm (range: 66.8 to 143.5 µm, n =30) formed on the pure cultures 7 days after incubation. Additional pure culture was obtained through an isolation of a single microsclerotium followed by a single hyphal tip transfer. One isolate was identified as Macrophomina phaseolina based on morphological characteristics (Smith and Wyllie 1999). The morphological identity was confirmed by sequencing the rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region with universal primers ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) and calmodulin (CAL) and translation elongation factor-1 alpha (TEF-1α) genes with MpTefF/MpTefR, and MpCalF/MpCalR primer sets (Santos et al. 2020), respectively. The online resource Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) confirmed the fungus identity as 100% M. phaseolina. The sequences of the original isolate BF21-25 were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers OQ615297 (ITS), OR357630 (CAL), and OR363106 (TEF-1α). To confirm pathogenicity, bioassays were conducted under controlled conditions. Four seeds of cultivar 'Etna' were sown per pot, and five pots were used for inoculated (approx. 4 × 105 microsclerotia/pot) and control (mock-inoculated with sterile PDA medium) treatments. For the inoculum, 20 g of macerated 10 to 14-day old M. phaseolina culture grown on PDA medium was applied to each pot using an inoculum layering technique. Pots were kept in the greenhouse with 28/17°C day/night, 13 h light/11 h dark cycle, and 70% relative humidity and watered weekly. Disease symptoms similar to those observed in the field were visible on all inoculated plants at the mid-seed-fill growth stage. Mock-inoculated control plants didn't show any symptoms. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results. The pathogen was re-isolated from infected plants to confirm Koch's postulates and identified as M. phaseolina based on the morphology and sequences of ITS, CAL and TEF-1α regions. To our knowledge, this is the first report of charcoal rot caused by M. phaseolina on dry bean in Western Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207