The Co-Occurrence of bZIP in-Frame <i>CEBPA</i>-Mutation with Unfavorable Genetic Abnormalities Is Associated with a Poor Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a previous study (SY Ahn et al, Cancer Res Treat 2023), we reported that the presence of only the basic leucine zipper in-frame mutation (bZIP in-f) CEBPA is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with CEBPAdouble mutations. However, when bZIP in-fCEBPAmutations were accompanied by certain mutations in chromatic/DNA modifiers, cohesion complex, and splicing genes, patients exhibited inferior overall survival (OS). FLT3-ITD or additional cytogenetic abnormalities is known to rarely co-occur with CEBPA mutation in patients with AML. In cases where both bZIP in-fCEBPA and FLT3-ITD coexist, there are conflicting aspects in risk stratification, and research on its prognostic significance is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significances of the co-occurrence of bZIP in-fCEBPAmutation with unfavorable genetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia. In 832 patients who were diagnosed with AML excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia and underwent intensive induction therapy, 98 (11.8%) had bZIP in-fCEBPA. Among 98 patients with bZIP in-fCEBPA, eight cases had FLT3-ITD (5 with low allelic ratio, 3 with high allelic ratio), 19 patients had unfavorable genetic mutations according to the 2022 European LeukemiaNet guidelines, and 10 patients had non-favorable cytogenetic abnormalities as detected in diagnostic samples. We observed no clinical differences in features such as age, sex, WBC count, bone marrow blast percentage at diagnosis based on the co-occurrence unfavorable genetic abnormalities (unfavorable-gene). Among the 98 patients with bZIP in-f CEBPA, 30 out of 37 patients with unfavorable-gene achieved complete remission (CR) after induction therapy, and 55 out of 61 without unfavorable genetic abnormalities showed CR (p=0.20). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was proceeded at first CR in 21 out of 37 unfavorable-gene group, and 35 out of 61 bZIP in-fCEBPAonly group ( p=1.00). In the survival analysis, patients with FLT3-ITD, unfavorable genetic co-mutated, or non-favorable cytogenetic abnormalities with bZIP in-fCEBPA showed inferior OS (p=0.036) (Fig. A). Due to the limited number of patients for analysis, we classified them into two group: the unfavourable-gene group and bZIP in-fCEBPAonly group. We observed that the unfavourable-gene group had a poor OS compared to the bZIP in-fCEBPAonly group (HR 2.71, 95 CI; 1.32-5.55, p=0.007) (Fig.B). On multivariate analysis, unfavorable-gene group was only poorrisk factor for OS. Despite the inclusion of a relatively small number of patients, our study demonstrates that when co-occurrence of bZIP in-fCEBPA withunfavourable genetic abnormalities, it results in a poor prognosis. To confirm its clinical significance, further validation with a larger patient population is necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".