Capítulo 11. Relación entre los estilos de aprendizaje con el compromiso de los estudiantes universitarios en Videojuegos, Telemática, Computación y Comunicación Multimedia del Centro Universitario de la Costa.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de la presente investigación es determinar la relación entre los estilos de aprendizaje, con el compromiso de los estudiantes de ingenierías del Centro Universitario de la Costa.Se presenta un estudio cuantitativo, no experimental de forma transversal y con un alcance causal.La pertinencia del estudio abona a la generación del conocimiento para el desarrollo de un modelo de mejora en el proceso de enseñanza -aprendizaje dentro de las universidades.Se consideraron los estilos de aprendizaje visual, auditivo y kinestésico, entre los principales resultados podemos observar que el estilo de aprendizaje auditivo es el que tiene un mayor impacto sobre el compromiso escolar con un impacto de 0.7380688, mientras la de menor impacto es kinestésico con 0.2141692.El impacto total que tiene los estilos de aprendizaje kinestésico, visual y auditivo sobre el compromiso de los estudiantes es de 3.1277922.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".