MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389231026 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-184916

Childhood Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: A Scoping Review

2023· review· en· W4389231026 on OpenAlexaff
Caseng Zhang, Danielle Charland, Katie O’Hearn, MacGregor Steele, Robert J. Klaassen, Matthew Speckert

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutoimmune hemolytic anemiaObservational studyPediatricsPopulationIncidence (geometry)MEDLINEAnemiaIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a disorder characterized by excessive premature red blood cell breakdown due to the presence of autoantibodies. It is rare in children, with an estimated incidence of 0.2 per one million individuals younger than 20 years. There are no guidelines on the investigation and management of pediatric AIHA, and contemporary approaches are derived from adult guidelines. AIHA is an important cause of morbidity in pediatric hematology patients, and a review of pediatric AIHA investigation, diagnosis, and treatment is warranted. This scoping review will summarize the current landscape of diagnosis and management of pediatric AIHA to inform future studies aimed at formulating a pediatric specific approach to the investigation and management of this small but complex patient population. Methods This review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to July 27, 2021. All screening and data extraction was done in parallel by two reviewers. Experimental and observational studies reporting on diagnostic criteria, laboratory work up, or treatment/management of AIHA in populations with at least 20% of patients ≤18 years were included. Study characteristics, population characteristics, and study outcomes were extracted and synthesized narratively and descriptively using counts (percentages). Results After removing duplicates, the titles and abstracts of 1742 studies were screened and 109 studies were selected for full-text review. Forty three studies, published between 2003 and 2021, met inclusion criteria and proceeded to data extraction. Forty cohort studies (35 retrospective, 5 prospective) and 3 case-control studies were included. No randomized controlled trials were identified. Diagnostic criteria for AIHA was provided in 29 (67%) studies, with 4 (9%) studies classifying the severity of AIHA. All but one study defined AIHA with at least one of: positive direct antibody test, evidence of anemia, and evidence of hemolysis (including increased lactate dehydrogenase or bilirubin, or decreased haptoglobin). Patients with Evan's syndrome were included in 31 (72%) studies, and 30 (70%) studies included special populations such as transplant recipients or patients with underlying autoimmune conditions. AIHA treatments in pediatric patients were reported in 41 (95%) studies, with 26 (60%) studies dividing the treatments into first- and second-line therapies. Common first-line therapies included steroids (unspecified) in 18 (42%) studies, prednisone in 9 (21%) studies, methylprednisolone in 9 (21%) studies, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in 17 (40%) studies, and/or combinations of these therapies. Common second-line therapies included rituximab in 16 (37%) studies, cyclosporine in 16 (37%) studies, IVIG in 13 (30%) studies and/or combinations of these therapies. Discussion Compared to pediatric immune thrombocytopenia, there is substantially less information available describing pediatric AIHA. Most studies are retrospective and include both patients with isolated AIHA and Evan's syndrome. Data on diagnosis, investigation, and management are inconsistently reported. Only two studies reported their diagnostic approach for identifying secondary causes of AIHA. Although most studies described diagnostic criteria for AIHA, the specific criteria were variable, and only 4 studies classified AIHA according to severity. Specific treatments were variable. First-line treatments were most commonly a combination of corticosteroids and IVIG in keeping with guidelines for the management of AIHA in adults. Second-line treatments typically consisted of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent, with the specific medication or combination of medications varying depending on past therapies attempted and the patient's underlying disease. Conclusion Our review identified a deficit of high quality, prospective studies into pediatric AIHA. Prospective studies evaluating the treatment of pediatric AIHA are needed. A standardized definition and classification of pediatric AIHA will help guide much needed future studies of the appropriate investigation and management of pediatric AIHA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207