MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389231396 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-177655

Sickle Cell Health Awareness, Perspectives, and Experiences (SHAPE) Survey: Findings on the Burden of Sickle Cell Disease and Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients and Caregivers in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries

2023· article· en· W4389231396 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wasil Jastaniah, R. Hartfield, John S James, Biba Tinga, Elvie Ingoli, Mariane de Montalembert, Fernando Ferreira Costa, Alan R. Anderson, Joachim B. Kunz, Isaac Odame, Bélinda Lartey, Baba Inusa

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)Quality of life (healthcare)Family medicineDiseaseDisease burdenPediatricsInternal medicineGeographyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited disorder that adversely impacts the physical and emotional well-being of patients and caregivers, yet research on the impact of SCD on quality of life (QoL) is limited. In a systematic review the prevalence of SCD in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries ranged 0.24-5.8% (Abu-Shaheen et al. Expert Rev Hematol 2022). The 3 countries with the highest prevalence were Bahrain (1.2-2.1%, 2 studies), Saudi Arabia (0.24-4.5%, 15 studies), and Oman (5.8%, 1 study). The Sickle Cell Health Awareness, Perspectives, and Experiences (SHAPE) survey aimed to improve our understanding of the global burden of SCD. This analysis reports the experiences of patients with SCD and caregivers in GCC countries who participated in the SHAPE survey within the context of insights obtained globally. Methods: The SHAPE survey included patients and caregivers from Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, the UK, the US, and 4 countries in the GCC (Bahrain, Oman [patients only], Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates [UAE]). Participants completed a 12-minute face-to-face survey (GCC only) or online survey (other countries) comprising close-ended questions about their experiences with SCD. Patients with SCD aged ≥12 years and caregivers aged ≥18 years supporting a patient with SCD were eligible. Results: Of 919 patients and 207 caregivers globally who responded, 150 patients (16.3%; Saudi Arabia n=70, the UAE n=46, Bahrain n=19, and Oman n=15) and 50 caregivers (24.2%; Saudi Arabia n=25, the UAE n=17, and Bahrain n=8) were from GCC countries (Table). Symptoms experienced most frequently by patients in GCC countries and all surveyed patients, respectively, were fatigue/tiredness (91% vs 84%), bone aches (91% vs 69%), and vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) pain (81% vs 71%). Compared with all surveyed patients, a significantly greater proportion of patients in GCC countries experienced fatigue/tiredness, bones aches, VOC pain, generalized pain, and signs of organ damage (Figure). Symptoms reported by a significantly smaller proportion of patients in GCC countries than by all surveyed patients were poor sleep/insomnia, poor appetite, memory/concentration issues, nausea, yellow eyes/nails/skin, vision difficulties/retinopathy, and leg ulcers. The top 3 symptoms patients in GCC countries reported as being most impactful in terms of the following categories were: (i) relationships/potential relationships (25% VOC pain, 19% low mood/feeling depressed, 16% bone aches); (ii) family (30% VOC pain, 12% bone aches, 11% low mood/feeling depressed); and (iii) long-term health prospects (29% bone aches, 23% VOC pain, 21% signs of organ damage). The average number of missed school/work days in the past month for patients was 3.9 in GCC countries and 7.5 globally. A smaller proportion of patients in GCC countries were optimistic about their future compared with all surveyed patients (35% vs 52%). The biggest concerns of caregivers of individuals with SCD were worsening of symptoms (54% in GCC countries vs 17% globally) and early loss of life (34% vs 39%). Approximately half of caregivers agreed that caring for a person with SCD had a big or noticeable impact on their family (52% in GCC countries vs 50% globally). The majority of caregivers agreed they were well-equipped to care for someone with SCD (80% in GCC countries vs 72% globally). A smaller proportion of caregivers in GCC countries were optimistic about the future of the person they care for with SCD compared with all surveyed caregivers (32% vs 62%). Conclusions: Findings from the SHAPE survey highlight the physical and emotional burden of SCD on patients and caregivers in GCC countries. Patients in GCC countries reported VOC pain, bone aches, and low mood/feeling depressed as symptoms that most affected their relationships/potential relationships and family. Caregivers in GCC countries expressed concerns about early loss of life and worsening SCD symptoms. Overall, these findings underline the need for effective treatments that alleviate symptoms and manage disease sequalae, and for additional resources to improve the QoL of patients and caregivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207