MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389233142 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187408

A Longitudinal Single-Cell Atlas of Treatment Response in Pediatric AML

2023· article· en· W4389233142 on OpenAlexaff
Sander Lambo, Diane L. Trinh, Rhonda E. Ries, Dan Jin, Audi Setiadi, Michelle Ng, Véronique Leblanc, Suzanne Vercauteren, Soheil Meshinchi, Marco A. Marra

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyBC Children's HospitalCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEpigeneticsOncologyInternal medicineCancer researchGeneticsBioinformaticsMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (pAML) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of driver alterations, treatment response and patient outcomes. Although approximately 90% of pAML patients respond to initial treatment, tumours relapse frequently. Despite large-scale genomic sequencing efforts, it remains elusive why tumors relapse. Previously, mutations have been identified that affect transcriptional regulation, indicating that epigenetic processes may contribute to treatment resistance in pAML. We therefore studied how tumor epigenetic patterns, transcriptional regulation and cell populations change over the course of treatment using single-cell ATAC sequencing (scATAC-seq) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in pediatric populations. Methods: We profiled 330,047 cells using scRNA-seq and 353,984 cells using scATAC-seq derived from 28 uniformly treated pAML patients, driven by either MLL fusions, CBFB fusions, RUNX1 fusions, FLT3-ITD or other aberrations (i.e. CEBPA mutations). All patients were enrolled in the AAML1031 trial (https://childrensoncologygroup.org/aaml1031), a randomized phase 3 clinical trial that investigated the addition of Bortezomib (BTZ) and Sorafenib to standard treatment modalities. Samples were obtained serially at diagnosis, at remission and at relapse and single-cell profiles were compared between these stages. Results: We identified malignant and non-malignant populations in the scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq data, showing that in all cases, malignant cells from patients at diagnosis were distinct from those taken at relapse. Major differences between diagnosis and relapse were associated with differentiation, and by inferring distinct cell populations we identified that relapsed cell populations appeared to shift towards a more primitive state. The extent of this shift was dependent on the genetic subtype and the effects were more pronounced in MLL-rearranged tumors. To identify the candidate mechanisms and transcription factors involved in this shift we studied the monocytic, lymphocytic and erythrocytic lineages in non-malignant cells and compared these to the tumor at diagnosis and relapse. Based on motif enrichment we found that across all different subgroups, transcription factors (TFs) that drive monocytic differentiation (i.e. CEBPA) have a lower activity while TFs driving erythrocytic and lymphocytic differentiation (i.e. TCF3) have a higher activity. Analysis of hematopoietic stem-like and progenitor-like cells (HSPC-like) confirmed this change, indicating that the “priming” towards other lineages is not only a result of shifts in cell populations but also a result of rewiring of early progenitors. To investigate this rewiring, we analysed regions of open chromatin that were enriched in malignant HSPCs compared to normal HSPCs across different subgroups. We found that those regions were highly specific to the driving alteration and were enriched for MEF2C binding sites in MLL-driven tumors and AP-1 binding sites in other tumors. Overall, upon relapse MEF2C expression and inferred TF activity appeared to increase, coinciding with an apparent increase in lymphoid priming and early lymphoid factors including LMO2, LYL1 and TCF3, among others. Two cases in the cohort appeared to switch lineage from a monocytic to lymphocytic phenotype and were enriched in CD19 and CD79A positive malignant cells upon relapse. Both cases shared the characteristic that MEF2C was upregulated upon relapse and showed upregulation of typical B-lymphoid transcription factors such as PAX5. Discussion: By generating a large dataset of pediatric AML patient samples collected at diagnosis, remission and relapse, we have identified changes in cellular hierarchies and transcriptional networks that occur upon relapse. Our study shows that shifts in cell populations readily occur upon treatment and are dependent on subgroup-defining alterations. Particularly MLL-rearranged tumors show a high level of plasticity that could explain the poor outcome of this group. Furthermore, we show that tumors appear to adapt their transcriptional programs towards a more “stem-like” state, with a likely higher propensity to differentiate towards other lineages such as the lymphoid lineage. We have identified MEF2C as a possible regulator of these processes, opening a new perspective to target the plasticity of these tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207