MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389233152 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-177798

Outcome of Infants Treated on Total Therapy for Infants with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia I: Results from a Non-Randomized Multi-Center Study

2023· article· en· W4389233152 on OpenAlexaff
Tanja A. Grüber, Minxuan Huang, Sima Jeha, Rebecca Deyell, Victor Lewis, Bill H. Chang, Eric Lowe, Jamie Frediani, Catherine Vézina, Bruno Michon, Nathan Gossai, Erin H. Breese, Thai Hoa Tran, Norman J. Lacayo, Christine Bolen, Sunil Desai, Jennifer L. Pauley, Emily Ashcraft, Cheng Cheng, Kirk R. Schultz, Krysta Schils, Linda C. Stork, Van Huynh, Michael A. Richards, Yoav H. Messinger, Henrique Bittencourt, Terzah M. Horton, Uma H. Athale, Duncan Stearns, Deborah Schiff, Paul S. Gaynon

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalMcMaster UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversity of CalgaryMontreal Children's HospitalBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVorinostatInternal medicineTolerabilityAdverse effectClinical endpointLeukopeniaOncologyPediatricsChemotherapyClinical trialHistone deacetylase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infants with KMT2A rearranged (KMT2Ar) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a poor prognosis with an event-free-survival (EFS) of 33.6-36.9% on recent Children's Oncology Group and Interfant trials. In preclinical studies, we identified bortezomib and vorinostat as novel active agents in primary KMT2Ar infant ALL specimens that have not been included in infant regimens to date. Total therapy for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia I (TINI) evaluated this novel combination in a multi-institutional pilot trial for infants with de novo ALL. In this study, bortezomib and vorinostat were incorporated into an ALL chemotherapy backbone containing dexamethasone, mitoxantrone, and pegasparaginase during induction and reinduction chemotherapy cycles. A run-in dose escalation evaluated 3 dose levels of vorinostat which was then followed by a dose expansion phase. The primary endpoint of the study was tolerability; secondary endpoints included minimal residual disease (MRD), 3-year EFS and overall survival (OS). Fifty patients enrolled between 2017-2021. Median follow up was 3.4 years (range 1.6-6.8 years). The six patients in the dose escalation phase had no dose-limiting toxicities. Forty-four patients received vorinostat at the third dose level (DL3) of 180 mg/m 2/dose. 68% of patients treated at DL3 had CNS involvement at diagnosis. 68% of DL3 patients carried a KMT2Ar. The most frequent KMT2A partner genes were AFF1 (40%), MLLT1 (20%), and MLLT3 (13%). The most frequent grade 3-4 non-hematologic adverse events during induction include neutropenic fever (45%), hypertension (43%), infection (40%), anorexia (32%), diarrhea (18%) and perineal skin ulceration (16%). There were 3 episodes of sepsis and 1 induction death due to parainfluenza pneumonia. Fewer events and no deaths or proven sepsis occurred during reinduction, with only grade 3 hypertriglyceridemia exceeding 10% of patients affected (18%). 79% of all patients and 69% of KMT2Ar patients became MRD negative by flow cytometry on day 22 of induction following our investigational block. Following induction intensification with cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and mercaptopurine, 77% and 66% of all patients and KMT2Ar patients respectively were MRD negative at the time of count recovery. Eight of the forty-four patients, all KMT2Ar, underwent stem cell transplant in first remission due to persistent MRD positivity at the end of consolidation. The 3-year EFS and OS probabilities (SE) of all forty-four DL3 patients were 56.5% (8.0) and 70.5% (7.3), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) with death considered a competing event was 29.3% (6.9) and the cumulative incidence of death (CID) as a first event was 8.9% (4.5). Patients lacking a KMT2Ar had superior outcomes with 85.7% (9.4) EFS and 92.9% (6.9) OS. The EFS and OS of KMT2Ar patients were 44.8% (9.5) and 62% (9.1) respectively. CIR and CID for KMT2Ar patients was 43.5% (9.6) and 7.2% (5) respectively. KMT2Ar patients ≥90 days at diagnosis had superior outcomes compared to their younger counterparts with 59.1% (10.5) EFS and 77.3% (8.9) OS. End of induction MRD was predictive of an event in this subgroup, with 85.6% (9.4) EFS for MRD negative patients and 14.3% (13.2) EFS for MRD positive patients. In contrast, KMT2Ar patients < 90 days of age at diagnosis had poor outcomes irrespective of MRD with 12.5% (11.7) EFS and 25% (15.3) OS. Notably KMT2Ar patients < 90 days who were MRD negative at the end of induction had a median time to relapse of 600 days (range 282-969 days), a late time point for this malignancy that typically relapses within a year from initial diagnosis. This suggests the regimen effectively reduced tumor burden leading to an extended duration of remission but failed to sufficiently eradicate disease to prevent relapse. We conclude that the incorporation of bortezomib and vorinostat for treatment of infants with ALL was well tolerated. MRD responses in KMT2Ar patients were robust. Although the study was not powered to evaluate outcomes, EFS and OS in KMT2Ar patients suggest a clinical signal worth pursuing given the low proportion of patients transplanted in first remission. The successor study, TINI 2 (NCT05848687), will build upon the bortezomib/vorinostat backbone by incorporating 2 cycles of blinatumomab and the menin inhibitor ziftomenib in combination with chemotherapy during reinduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→