MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389233774 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187446

Infusion of UM171-Expanded Cord Blood Led to Excellent Survival in Patients with High-Risk Leukemias: Results from Two Independent Phase II Studies

2023· article· en· W4389233774 on OpenAlexaffabout
Filippo Milano, Guy Sauvageau, Gabrielle Thauvette, Nadia M. Bambace, Léa Bernard, Imran Ahmad, Jean Roy, Laura Roberts, Laurel A. Thur, Jenna B Pedersen, Ann Dahlberg, Sandra Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeutropenia and Cancer Infections
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeukemiaCord bloodInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients experience delayed hematopoietic recovery and an increased risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM). UM171 is a small molecule that expands hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC). An initial phase I-II clinical trial of a single UM171-expanded CBT was associated with low NRM and excellent long-term outcomes. (S Cohen et al. Lancet Haematology 2020). With the primary goal of generating increased numbers of HSPC to supplement a conventional single cord blood (CB) graft, we tested the same approach exclusively in high and very high-risk patients with acute leukemias/myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). M ethods: Between 2019 and 2022, two single independent prospective phase II studies were conducted in Montreal, at the Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital and in Seattle, at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Primary objectives were safety/NRM and progression free survival at 2-years post-transplant. Only patients with high and very-high risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) and MDS were eligible. Patients were required to have adequate organ function and comorbidity index as defined by the transplant center. Patients received a single UM171 7-day expanded and cryopreserved CB after either a myeloablative or mid-intensity conditioning regimen. All patients received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis. Results: A total of 52 patients were enrolled (31 in Montreal and 21 in Seattle) with 2 patients not receiving the UM171 expanded product and therefore removed from the final analysis. Patient's characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age was 44 years (range 19-66) and weight 78 kg (range, 44-145). Twenty-eight patients (54%) were either in a no complete response (CR) status or in ≥CR2, ten (19%) were p53+ and 17 (33%) were second or third transplants. Forty patients (77%) received a 5/8 HLA-matched CB unit and the median of CD34+ cells infused was 4.7 10 6/Kg (0.9-7.5). All patients engrafted (ANC >500 10^ 9/L for 2 consecutive days) at a median of 17 days (range, 9-39 days). The median time to platelet recovery (>20 x 10^ 9/L) was 37 days (range 24-116). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range 0.7 - 39), the probability of 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 67% (95% CI, 54-82) and 63% (95% CI, 50-79). OS for second/third transplants and p53+ patients was 64% (95% CI, 43-96) and 40 (95% CI, 19-86), PFS was 51 % (95% CI, 29-87) and 40 (95% CI, 19-86), respectively. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of NRM was 19% (95% CI, 8-31) while the incidence of relapse was 18% (95% CI, 6-29). The incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD was 69% (95% CI, 56−82%) and 16% (95% CI, 6−27%). The rate of moderate/severe chronic GVHD was 7% (95% CI,1−15%) and translated in an incidence of a chronic-relapse-free-survival of 55% (95% CI, 42−72%). Of note, Kaplan-Meier analysis of all clinical outcomes showed no difference for patients treated in Montreal and Seattle, and results were similar for both centers (Figure 1). Conclusions: The results of 2 independent Phase II clinical studies demonstrated that infusion of a UM171 single CBT led to excellent clinical outcomes in patients with high and very-high risk malignancies including patients with p53+ mutation. We also observed encouraging results for patients undergoing second/third transplants (33% of the entire cohort). Clinical outcomes were similar between the two Transplant Centers. Based on these positive results, a multicenter randomized clinical trial is currently in the planning stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFrench-language works237,207