Automated Coronary Artery Tracking with a Voronoi-Based 3D Centerline Extraction Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and medical imaging methods such as coronary artery computed tomography are vitally important in its detection. More recently, various computational approaches have been proposed to automatically extract important artery coronary features (e.g., vessel centerlines, cross-sectional areas along vessel branches, etc.) that may ultimately be able to assist with more accurate and timely diagnoses. The current study therefore validated and benchmarked a recently developed automated 3D centerline extraction method for coronary artery centerline tracking using synthetically segmented coronary artery models based on the widely used Rotterdam Coronary Artery Algorithm Evaluation Framework (RCAAEF) training dataset. Based on standard accuracy metrics and the ground truth centerlines of all 32 coronary vessel branches in the RCAAEF training dataset, this 3D divide and conquer Voronoi diagram method performed exceptionally well, achieving an average overlap accuracy (OV) of 99.97%, overlap until first error (OF) of 100%, overlap of the clinically relevant portion of the vessel (OT) of 99.98%, and an average error distance inside the vessels (AI) of only 0.13 mm. Accuracy was also found to be exceptionally for all four coronary artery sub-types, with average OV values of 99.99% for right coronary arteries, 100% for left anterior descending arteries, 99.96% for left circumflex arteries, and 100% for large side-branch vessels. These results validate that the proposed method can be employed to quickly, accurately, and automatically extract 3D centerlines from segmented coronary arteries, and indicate that it is likely worthy of further exploration given the importance of this topic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it