MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B130: Phase 1 study of Zanidatamab Zovodotin (ZW49): Safety Profile and Recommended Dose (RD) in patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-positive solid cancers

2023· article· en· W4389241514 on OpenAlexaff
Do‐Youn Oh, Philippe L. Bédard, Keun‐Wook Lee, Hyo S. Han, Yoon‐Koo Kang, Wilson H. Miller, Sun Young Rha, Jwa Hoon Kim, Efrat Dotan, Chih‐Yi Liao, Anthony W. Tolcher, Alexander I. Spira, Erika Hamilton, Christos S. Karapetis, Lisa Boyken, Charles Chen, Joseph Woolery, Komal Jhaveri

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsZymeworks (Canada)McGill UniversityJewish General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineTrastuzumabPharmacokineticsInternal medicinePopulationCancerPharmacologyAdverse effectAntibody-drug conjugateOncologyBreast cancerAntibodyGastroenterologyImmunologyMonoclonal antibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background ZW49 is a novel, humanized, antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a bispecific antibody directed against 2 non-overlapping HER2 epitopes and attached to a proprietary auristatin toxin with a protease-cleavable linker. Here we present data supporting the selection of the ZW49 RD in an ongoing, first-in-human, dose escalation (DE) and dose expansion (DX) study (NCT03821233).1 Methods The 3+3 DE phase evaluated safety and tolerability of ZW49 IV (1-1.75 mg/kg QW; 1-2 mg/kg Q2W; and 2-3 mg/kg Q3W) in pts with HER2+ cancers. The DX phase further evaluated safety and antitumor activity of ZW49 IV (1.25 and 1.5 mg/kg QW; 2.5 mg/kg Q3W) in pts with centrally confirmed HER2+ (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/FISH+) cancers. Primary endpoints are safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose/RD. Secondary endpoints are pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters and response per RECIST1.1. Analyses of data for 66 pts treated with ZW49 at select cohorts/regimens in DE and DX are herein presented. Results As of 19 Dec 2022, 66 pts (n = 18, 1.25 mg/kg QW; n = 18, 1.5 mg/kg QW; and n = 30, 2.5 mg/kg Q3W; male, 52%; median age, 60.5 years [range, 32 – 83]) were treated with ZW49 in the selected population. The most common cancer types were gastric (35%) and breast (15%); 67% of pts had received prior HER2-targeted therapy; median number of prior metastatic therapies was 3 (range, 1 – 13). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 91% (100% [18/18 pts] in 1.5 mg/kg QW, 93% [28/30 pts] in 2.5 mg/kg Q3W, and 78% [14/18 pts] in 1.25 mg/kg QW regimens). Overall, the most common (≥ 20%) TRAEs were keratitis (44%), alopecia (26%), and diarrhea (24%); the majority were Grade (Gr) 1 or 2 in severity; Gr 3 or 4 TRAEs occurred in 14 (21%) pts. Serious TRAEs occurred in 4 (6%) pts. Eight pts discontinued (D/C) due to TRAEs, including 1 pt D/C due to a serious TRAE (Gr 4 infusion-related reaction [IRR]; 2.5 mg/kg Q3W). No interstitial lung disease or TR-deaths were reported. Seven dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred, including 4 DLTs in 1.5 mg/kg QW (3 Gr 2 keratitis events and 1 Gr 3 diarrhea), 2 DLTs in 1.25 mg/kg QW (Gr 3 blurred vision and Gr 3 IRR), and 1 DLT in 2.5 mg/kg Q3W (Gr 2 keratitis) regimens. The 1.5 mg/kg QW regimen was closed due to the frequency of DLTs and dose modifications observed. The safety profile was comparable between the 1.25 mg/kg QW and 2.5 mg/kg Q3W regimens. Preliminary PK analyses indicated that the half-life was similar across these dose/regimens. The confirmed objective response rate and disease control rate in HER2+ response-evaluable pts were 6% (1/17 pt) and 53% (9/17 pts) in 1.25 mg/kg QW regimen; and 31% (9/29 pts) and 72% (21/29 pts) in 2.5 mg/kg Q3W regimen, respectively. Based on these results, 2.5 mg/kg Q3W regimen was chosen as the RD. Conclusions ZW49 2.5 mg/kg Q3W IV was well tolerated, showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with advanced HER2+ cancers, and has been identified as the RD for further clinical development. References 1 Jhaveri K, et al.; ESMO; Sep 09 -13 2022 Citation Format: Do-Youn Oh, Philippe L Bedard, Keun-Wook Lee, Hyo Sook Han, Yoon-Koo Kang, Wilson H Miller, Sun Young Rha, Jwa Hoon Kim, Efrat Dotan, Chih-Yi Liao, Anthony Tolcher, Alexander Spira, Erika Hamilton, Christos Karapetis, Lisa Boyken, Charles Chen, Joseph Woolery, Komal Jhaveri. Phase 1 study of Zanidatamab Zovodotin (ZW49): Safety Profile and Recommended Dose (RD) in patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-positive solid cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B130.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207