MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389242912 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-174436

The Effect of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Sickle Cell Disease-Related Organ Damage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2023· review· en· W4389242912 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elisabeth Dovern, Mesire Aydin, Komeil Alizade, Bart J. Biemond, Erfan Nur

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisHematopoietic stem cell transplantationInternal medicineTransplantationConfidence intervalRelative risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only established curative treatment option for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). One of the main indications for HSCT is SCD-related organ damage, which is a major cause of morbidity and early mortality. However, whether HSCT is effective in recovering SCD-related organ dysfunction has not been systematically reviewed. Methods This is a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effects of HSCT on organ function in patients with SCD. We performed a comprehensive search in MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE up to June 2023, focusing on studies reporting pulmonary, cardiac, renal, splenic, and/or cerebral function parameters, as well as retinopathy and/or avascular osteonecrosis (AVN) before and after HSCT. Continuous data were analyzed using the weighted inverse-variance random effects meta-analyses, reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95%-CI). Binomial data were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects meta-analyses, reported as risk ratio (RR) and 95%-CI. A negative SMD indicates an improvement and a positive SMD indicates a worsening of the measured parameter post-HSCT. A RR <1 indicates a result in favor of the transplantation and a RR >1 indicates a worsening of the measured parameter after HSCT. The ‘Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale’ and the ‘Clinical Diversity in Meta-analysis’ (CDIM) tool were used to assess the quality and the clinical heterogeneity of the studies. Results Thirty-two of 476 studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 17 were used for the meta-analyses and 15 for the qualitative part of the review. Of the studies that were included in the meta-analyses, 4 comprised adult patients (n=184) and 13 pediatric and/or young adults <22 years old (n=591). The majority of donors were matched sibling donors (86.4%), and studies with both myeloablative and/or reduced intensity conditioning regimens were included. The CDIM score was low or moderate for all performed meta-analyses, suggesting fair clinical comparability among the studies. Summary plots of the meta-analyses are shown in Figure 1. Pulmonary function test parameters remained stable following HSCT (SMD -0.08, p=0.64 for forced expiratory volume in 1 second; SMD -0.13, p=0.35 for forced vital capacity; and SMD -0.95, p=0.30 for diffusing capacity). Mean tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) did not change significantly in the meta-analysis (SMD -0.34, p=0.14). However, 3 studies used for the qualitative review reported normalization in patients with prior elevated TRV. Whole brain cerebral blood flow improved significantly after transplantation (SMD -1.39, p=<0.01). Several studies reported an absent or very low incidence of new (silent) cerebral infarcts and a decrease of transcranial Doppler velocities following successful HSCT. In pediatric patients, creatinine clearance decreased significantly after HSCT (SMD -0.80, p=0.01) and the presence of proteinuria increased (RR 2.00, p=<0.01). Furthermore, splenic uptake ( 99mTc) and phagocytic function of the spleen improved (RR 0.31, p=<0.01 and RR 0.23, p=<0.01, respectively). Retinopathy and AVN before and after HSCT were investigated in only 1 study in children with SCD, both showing no significant changes post-HSCT. Discussion and Conclusion Allogeneic HSCT has the potential to stabilize or recover pulmonary and cardiac function parameters in SCD patients. In pediatric patients, splenic function parameters showed impressive improvement following HSCT. On the other hand, creatinine clearance decreased significantly in children. This might be a reflection of either normalization of SCD-related hyperfiltration or transplantation-related toxicity, which may also have contributed to the increased prevalence of proteinuria after HSCT. With respect to cerebral damage, cerebral perfusion parameters improved and progression of silent cerebral infarctions was prevented following HSCT. Last, we demonstrate a paucity of evidence regarding the course of renal function, retinopathy, and AVN in adult SCD transplant recipients. More research is needed to define which patients with SCD-related organ damage might benefit most from HSCT and which organs are less likely to recover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.032
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→