MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389243484 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-179739

Surgical Procedures and Hemostatic Outcome in Patients with Hemophilia Receiving Concizumab Prophylaxis during the Phase 3 explorer7 and explorer8 Trials

2023· article· en· W4389243484 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony K.C. Chan, Chris Barnes, Mary Mathias, Silvia Linari, Francisco José López Jaime, Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Julien Bovet, Jan Odgaard‐Jensen, Tadashi Matsushita

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialSurgeryRegimenHemarthrosisAdverse effectInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibody that has been developed for once-daily subcutaneous prophylactic treatment for hemophilia of all subtypes. The phase 3 explorer7 (NCT04083781) and explorer8 trials (NCT04082429) investigated the efficacy and safety of concizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A or B with (HAwI/HBwI, explorer7) or without (HA/HB, explorer8) inhibitors. Aim To provide an overview of any surgical procedures at the 56-week cut-off performed on patients who received concizumab prophylaxis in the explorer7 and explorer8 trials. Methods Patients in both explorer7 and explorer8 trials were exposed to no prophylaxis (arm 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (arms 2-4) based on their treatment regimen before the trial. After the main part of the trial, all patients (arms 1-4) could continue in the extension part of the trial receiving concizumab for up to 136 weeks. Informed consent/ethics committee approvals were obtained as appropriate. Minor surgical procedures (defined as any invasive operative procedure where only the skin, mucous membranes or superficial connective tissue is manipulated) were permitted during the explorer7 and explorer8 trials, and management of minor surgeries was at the investigator's discretion. Planned major surgery was not permitted, and for any cases of acute major surgery, a concizumab pause was recommended. Data regarding both minor and major surgeries undertaken in patients were collected at the 56-week cut-off of the trials. Local/topical use of anti-fibrinolytics was permitted during surgical procedures in both trials (single systemic doses allowed following benefit-risk evaluation) and patients undergoing minor surgical procedures continued to receive concizumab prophylaxis during the perioperative period (with no change to the dosage they received). Results During both trials, a total of 278 patients received concizumab prophylaxis. Of these, 30 patients underwent a minor surgical procedure, including 6 (20.0%) adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and 24 (80.0%) adults (aged 18-64 years). Nine patients who underwent a minor procedure had HA (30.0%), 10 had HB (33.3%), 7 had HAwI (23.3%) and 4 had HBwI (13.3%). Four patients underwent both major and minor surgeries and 2 patients underwent major surgeries only. In total, 44 surgical procedures were undergone in 32 patients. The surgical procedures that were performed in patients who received concizumab included a range of minor surgeries in both trials (including tooth extractions and other dental procedures, port removal, colonoscopy, arthrodesis and urethral augmentation). Overall, 6 cases of major surgery were reported during the explorer7 and explorer8 trials (left hip arthropathy, hematoma drainage, right femoral neck fracture, total knee arthroplasty, right ankle arthropathy and diagnostic laparoscopy with removal of blood from the abdominal cavity) in 1 patient with HA, 2 patients with HB, 1 patient with HAwI and 2 patients with HBwI respectively. Bleeding episodes related to minor and major surgical procedures (n=30) were reported in 24 patients and in 15 of these a total of 17 bleeding episodes were treated. The majority of patients (n=12) who reported a treated surgical-related bleeding episode had undergone a dental surgical procedure. Other minor surgical procedures with associated bleeding episodes included port removal, and venesection. The number and type of minor surgical procedures are further described in Table 1. Conclusion Minor surgical procedures were conducted in approximately 11% of patients who received treatment with concizumab during the phase 3 explorer7 and explorer8 trials. Most minor surgeries that took place were dental procedures and the majority of surgical-related bleeding episodes were mild or moderate. Overall, minor surgeries could be performed on patients with hemophilia under concizumab prophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→