New research on religion in Ukraine <b>Orthodoxy in two manifestations? The conflict in Ukraine as expression of a fault line in world Orthodoxy</b> , edited by Thomas Bremer, Alfons Brüning, and Nadieszda Kizenko, Erfurter Studien zur Kulturgeschichte des orthodoxen Christentums, vol. 21, Berlin, Peter Lang, 2022, 428 pp., $113.05 (cloth), ISBN 978-3-631-88699-1 <b>The Church’s unholy war: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Orthodoxy</b> , by Nicholas Denysenko, Eugene, OR, Cascade Books, 2023, xviii + 160 pp., US$25.00 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-6667-4815-4 <b>Everyday religiosity and the politics of belonging in Ukraine</b> , by Catherine Wanner, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2022, xviii + 225 pp., US$24.95 (paperback) (also available for free download from the publisher’s website), ISBN 978-1-5017-6498-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ukraine has long been one of the liveliest fields in the study of religion in eastern Europe. After all, questions of religious identity and independence have been central to Ukrainian state- and n...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".