MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389246785 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-191338

Global Burden and Trends of Multiple Myeloma in High-Income North America Countries between 1990-2019, with Projections of Deaths to 2040: A Benchmarking Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

2023· article· en· W4389246785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dhruvkumar Gadhiya, Vishrant Amin, Yashkumar Girdharlal Kamani, Gaganapalle Mahesh, Kopal Kotak, Rani Ratheesh, Hardik Dineshbhai Desai

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDisease burdenIncidence (geometry)EpidemiologyConfidence intervalDemographyBurden of diseaseGlobal healthYears of potential life lostMortality ratePublic healthDiseaseGerontologyEnvironmental healthPopulationLife expectancySurgeryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM), a malignant neoplasm originating from plasma cells, imposes a considerable health burden in high-income North America (HINA). It ranks as the 14th leading cause of cancer-related deaths and disability in HINA countries. This study aims to assess the epidemiological aspects of MM, including its incidence, prevalence, mortality rates, and non-fatal health outcomes across HINA countries over the last three decades (1990-2019) with projections of deaths up to 2040. Methods: Using the Global Burden of Disease methodology, we evaluated MM prevalence, incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) based on age group, sex, and year across HINA from 1990 to 2019, utilizing standardized approaches and statistical modeling. We employed a regression framework to forecast MM deaths through 2040, and the results were presented in absolute counts and age-standardized rates (per 100,000 person-years). Results: The absolute prevalence of MM increased from 42,637 (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 35,449-44,970) in 1990 to 101,994 (95% UI: 86,889-127,309) in 2019. Similarly, deaths increased from 11,200 (95% UI: 9,435-11,633) to 19,941 (95% UI: 18,012-22,919) during 1990-2019, and DALYs increased from 235,334 (95% UI: 194,820-244,361) in 1990 to 388,955 (95% UI: 360,494-478,317) in 2019. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) increased from 4.32 (95% UI: 3.62-4.5) to 4.8 (95% UI: 4.12-5.87) cases per 100,000 persons from 1990-2019. However, the annual percentage of change (APC) in age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) and age-standardized DALY rate (ASDALR) decreased by 1% and 8%, respectively, from 1990-2019. Among HINA countries, Canada observed the highest APC increase in total deaths (111%), followed by Greenland (110%) and the United States (75%) during 1990-2019. In terms of age groups, the 70-74 age group observed the highest number of incidences (5,257), deaths (3,336), and DALYs (67,310) in 2019. The 80+ age group exhibited the highest APC in total deaths, incidence, and DALYs from 1990-2019. Furthermore, males experienced a higher burden compared to females over the last three decades. The projected number of MM deaths in HINA is expected to reach 28,904 (95% UI: 22,690-37,300) by 2040. Conclusion: This study reveals the secular trend of MM burden in HINA, indicating a significant increase in MM cases and its impact on public health. MM accounted for 2.295% of deaths among all cancer-related deaths in HINA in 2019. The burden of MM has been on the rise in general from 1990 to 2019 and is predicted to continue increasing over the next two decades. Notably, there is a noticeable disparity in MM burden, with higher prevalence in males compared to females. Age and cohort effects appear to play a significant role, with elevated risk observed among elderly individuals and those from earlier-born cohorts. Nonetheless, continuous surveillance, data collection, and research efforts are crucial to monitor evolving epidemiological trends and inform evidence-based policies aimed at mitigating the impact of multiple myeloma on individuals and society in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→