MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389246921 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-180151

Evaluation of Bone Health Using High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography in Survivors of Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2023· article· en· W4389246921 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ziyad Alrajhi, Adam P. Yan, Etienne Sochett, Reza Vali, Amer Shammas, Michelle Furman, Emily Lam, Maria Locke, Paul C. Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative computed tomographyMedicineBone mineralBone densityLean body massTrabecular bone scoreNuclear medicineRadiologyInternal medicineOsteoporosisBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone mass accrual, bone architecture, and strength may be impaired in children with a history of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) resulting in low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. The Children's Oncology Group recommends evaluating ALL survivors' bone health with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing. However, DXA testing may not accurately measure bone health in survivors due to low bone area for height, short stature, growth delays or decreased lean muscle mass. Further, it does not differentiate between trabecular and cortical bone, nor does it provide insights into bone microarchitecture and strength. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is a three-dimensional non-invasive imaging modality that provides a comprehensive assessment bone microarchitecture, volumetric BMD (vBMD) of both cortical and trabecular bone, and bone strength. In adult patients, HR-pQCT parameters have been shown to predict incident fractures. In this pilot study we utilized HR-pQCT to evaluate bone microarchitecture, vBMD, bone geometry and bone strength of peri-pubertal and pubertal survivors of ALL compared to healthy controls. Methods: We prospectively recruited ALL survivors (>1 year off therapy) with a DXA BMD Z-score between -2.0 to 0 within the proceeding six months, who were in early-late puberty (pre-pubertal patients excluded), and aged 11 to 18 years, along with healthy controls in the same age range at a single academic pediatric center in Canada. While a BMD Z-score of -2.0 to 0 has historically been considered normal, many children with Z-scores in this range have skeletal fragility and an increased fracture risk. Patients were excluded if they had comorbidity that impacts bone microarchitecture (ex. chronic kidney disease), were on a medication that impacts bone health (ex. corticosteroids) or had a genetic syndrome that increased their sensitivity to radiation (ex. Ataxia Telangiectasia). HR-pQCT of the distal radius and tibia was performed using the a standardized protocol. Bone mass was compared using total, trabecular and cortical vBMD, bone architecture was compared using cortical porosity and bone strength was compared using failure load. HR-pQCT derived variables were compared between ALL and control groups following stratification by sex. HR-pQCT values were summarized using medians and interquartile ranges and medians were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. All tests were two tailed and p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 59 subjects were recruited (34 ALL survivors, 25 healthy controls). The sex of participants was male for 56.0% (n=14) of controls and 61.7% (n=21) of ALL survivors and female for 44.0% (n=11) of controls and 38.3% (n=13) of survivors. All survivors had received corticosteroids and methotrexate, and five (15%) had received cranial radiation. ALL survivors were not more likely than controls to report a history of a fracture (32.4%, n=11 vs. 16%, n=4). Additional data regarding the participants demographics is presented in Table 1. Male survivors had a lower radial trabecular vBMD, tibial total vBMD, and tibial trabecular vBMD, and a higher tibial failure load compared to healthy male controls. Female survivors had a lower radial total vBMD, radial trabecular vBMD, tibial total vBMD, and tibial trabecular vBMD. Female ALL survivors also had higher radial and tibial failure loads compared to healthy female controls. No differences in cortical porosity or cortical vBMD were identified between survivors and healthy controls. Complete HR-pQCT data is presented in Table 2. Conclusions: We demonstrated differences in the HR-pQCT parameters of peripubertal and pubertal ALL survivors compared to healthy controls. Survivors had reductions in key HR-pQCT parameters and an increased tibial failure load compared to healthy controls. In future studies HR-pQCT should be performed at a uniform time point post ALL therapy and used to predict future adverse bone health outcome such as fractures. Using this HR-pQCT guided approach ALL survivors at greatest risk of an adverse bone health outcome can be offered early interventions to prevent these outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→