MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389247224 · doi:10.1142/s0219455424502274

Convolutional LSTM-Attention Based Encoder–Decoder Neural Network for Prediction of Chaotic Vibrations of Multi-Dimensional Dynamic Systems

2023· article· en· W4389247224 on OpenAlexafffund
Luyao Wang, Liming Dai, Haixing Zhao, Pan Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQinghai Normal University
KeywordsComputer scienceChaoticGeneralizationEncoderDecoding methodsConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceResidualConvergence (economics)Artificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present research proposes a convolutional long-short term memory (ConvLSTM) with an attention mechanism (AM) model, termed as ConvLSTM-AM, to conduct prediction of chaotic vibrations of multi-dimensional dynamic systems. The proposed data-driven model is based on an encoder–decoder architecture where the lengths of inputs and outputs are variable. Different from other conventional benchmarks which consider the temporal correlation solely to deal with the chaotic sequences, this research work takes the spatial information into account. In this sense, the ConvLSTM is adopted as an encoder to acquire useful chaotic spatiotemporal patterns and retain long-term successive dependencies. LSTM and AM in this research are taken as the main structures of the procedure in decoding, in which the LSTM is used as the further temporal processor and AM is stacked on the top to exploit more salient information of the historical data. Among that, a residual connection between the outputs of LSTM and the information of attention is considered in AM to prevent gradient vanishment. Two datasets of chaotic vibrations of multi-dimensional systems are employed to adequately illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model. Besides, five conventional benchmarks are built to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed model in terms of both training and generalization performance. As found in the research, the training time is reduced with lower testing loss in comparing with the other five counterparts, as the spatial information introduced expedites the training convergence. The present research provides a useful guidance for predicting and analysing chaotic vibrations of multi-dimensional dynamic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and DynamicsSame topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207