MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389247513 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-181972

Clonal Hematopoiesis, Inflammation, Hemostasis, and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers: The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study

2023· article· en· W4389247513 on OpenAlexaff
Radhika Gangaraju, Katherine Wilkinson, Nicole D. Armstrong, Alexander G. Bick, Caitlyn Vlasschaert, Wasay Khan, Diego Adrianzen Herrera, Marguerite R. Irvin, Nels C. Olson, Mary Cushman, Smita Bhatia, Neil A. Zakai

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicinePopulationStroke (engine)BiomarkerCohortDiseaseProspective cohort studyOncologyGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONCLUSIONS Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple age-associated disorders including malignancy, cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease, and mortality. Some of these adverse outcomes may be mediated by CH-driven inflammatory dysregulation, but the association of CH with biomarkers in other pathways related to these outcomes has not been studied. We studied the association between CH and biomarkers of inflammation, hemostasis and cardiometabolic risk in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. REGARDS is a prospective study that enrolled 30,239 Black and White individuals ≥45 years across United States between 2003 and 2007, and collected extensive health data by telephone and in-person exams. Biomarkers listed in Table 2, and CH were measured in baseline blood samples in an age-, sex-, and race-stratified cohort random sample (CRS). We excluded participants with prior history of CVD. Sequencing was performed at >500x depth to identify somatic mutations in 24 of the most common CH genes, capturing >95% of CH observed in the general population. CH was categorized based on variant allele frequency (VAF) of the dominant mutation as 0%, >0-<2%, 2-10% and >10%. Linear regression was used to calculate the age-, sex-, and race-adjusted difference in mean biomarker level for those with versus those without CH. The study included 781 participants (mean age at enrollment: 66 years [SD 12.1], 46% male, 50% Black individuals). The prevalence of CH at varying VAF was: VAF 0% - 43.3%; VAF >0 to <2% - 32.5%; 2 to 10% - 18.4%; >10% - 5.8%. Mutations were most prevalent in DNMT3A (60.3%), then TET2 (13.8%) and ASXL1 (10.1%). The mean age was higher in participants with CH (73 years, SD 10) than in those without CH (61 years, SD 11). Distributions of the most common CH mutations at VAF ≥2% by age, sex and race are shown in Table 1. Mutations in DNMT3A were overrepresented in Black participants and women, whereas mutations in TET2 and ASXL1 were more common in White participants. Associations of CH with inflammation, hemostasis and cardiometabolic biomarkers were presented in Table 2. Mean Log IL-8 was 0.23 (95% CI 0.05-0.41) units higher in those with high VAF CH (>10%) versus those without CH, with no association among other inflammation biomarkers.Among hemostasis biomarkers, mean log D-dimer was 0.26 (95% CI 0.01-0.52) units higher in those with high VAF CH versus those without CH. There was a non-significant trend towards an association between CH and lower Factor VIII and higher fibrinogen (Table 2). Among cardiometabolic biomarkers, mean log Adiponectin was 0.32 (95% CI 0.04-0.61) units higher in those with high VAF CH versus no CH. We did not identify a statistically significant association between CH and other cardiometabolic markers. CH is prevalent in the general population, especially at low VAF. In addition to inflammatory dysregulation, findings here suggest possible other pathways for deleterious effects of CH on health via hemostasis and cardiometabolic pathways. Since our study was cross-sectional, we could not ascertain if CH leads to abnormal biomarker levels or if pathways represented by the above biomarkers predispose to CH. Studying associations of CH with serial biomarkers in a larger population, by specific mutations, and by sex and race will provide mechanistic insights on CH associated adverse outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→