MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389248026 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187346

Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Outcomes By VES-13 and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older Adults with Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

2023· article· en· W4389248026 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Connor Johnson, Netana H. Markovitz, Richard Newcomb, Daniel Yang, Julia Rice, Bridget Coffey, Oreofe O. Odejide, Areej El‐Jawahri

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAstraZeneca
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleDepression (economics)AnxietyGeriatric Depression ScalePhysical therapyGeriatric oncologyCancerInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Older adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) can experience durable remissions with therapy but also substantial toxicities and healthcare utilization. The Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) is a 13-item tool assessing age, self-rated health, and ability to perform physical and functional activities (score of 3+ indicates vulnerability). The Fondazione Italiana Linfomi comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) assesses age, comorbidities, and ability to perform physical and functional activities and classifies patients as fit, unfit, or frail. Both the VES-13 and CGA hold promise to risk stratify older adults for poor outcomes. Few data are available comparing these tools in assessing risk for poor survival and healthcare utilization, and prior studies have not examined the impact of therapy on longitudinal patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: We conducted a longitudinal prospective study of 105 older adults with aggressive NHL at Massachusetts General Hospital or the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 9/2020 and 1/2023. Eligible patients were age >= 65 years at time of treatment initiation receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy. Patients could enroll up until cycle 1 day 8 of therapy. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline and 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, and 6 months post therapy initiation assessing demographics, quality of life (QOL-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma [FACT-Lym]), depression and anxiety (Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale [HADS]), and physical symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-revised [ESAS-r]). At baseline patients also completed the VES-13 and underwent CGA evaluated by an oncologist. We utilized linear mixed models to examine longitudinal QOL, depression, anxiety, and physical symptoms. We assessed univariate factors associated with longitudinal QOL. Using Cox regression models controlling for gender, age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), hypoalbuminemia, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and lymphoma subtype, we assessed the relationship of VES-13 and CGA in separate models with overall survival (OS). We also examined factors associated with unplanned hospitalization within 6 months of therapy start using logistic regression. Results: We enrolled 106/163 (65.0%) patients. 1 patient was excluded due to treatment with an ineligible therapy. Patients had a median age of 73 years (range: 65-99, 38.1% >75, 21.9% >=80); most were male gender (64.8%), White race (96.2%), and married/with a life partner (72.4%). The most common lymphoma subtypes were DLBCL (73.0%), DLBCL/high grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 translocations (12.4%), and mantle cell lymphoma (10.5%). The majority (56/104, 53.8%) had an age-adjusted IPI of 2 or 3, over a third (34.3%) had a CCI score of 2+, and 82.9% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-1. 45.7% (48/105) had a VES-13 score of 3+. 40.0%, 9.5%, and 50.5% were fit, unfit, and frail, respectively, on CGA. QOL, depression, anxiety, and physical symptoms all improved over time (Figure 1). QOL improved regardless of age group, VES-13 category (<3 vs 3+), or CGA result (Figure 1). Compared to other patients, those 80+ years with either VES-13 score 3+ (β= -2.90, p=0.045) or frail on CGA (β= -3.68, p=0.007) had a worse QOL trajectory. Income > $50,000 annually (β=2.41; p=0.041) was associated with better QOL trajectory. VES-13 score of 3+ (HR=6.08; p=0.014) and frail on CGA (HR=5.20; p=0.028) were both associated with worse survival. Of those with follow up (N=66), 8 died within 1 year (1-year OS=87.9%), all of whom were both frail on CGA and had VES-13 score 3+. 25.8% (8/31) of the CGA frail patients and 28.6% (8/28) of those with VES-13 3+ died within 1 year. VES-13 score (OR=1.16, p=0.028) was associated with greater likelihood of unplanned hospitalization. Conclusion: Older adults with aggressive NHL often experience improvement in QOL and other PROs with treatment, even across age and frailty categories. VES-13 score and CGA identify patient groups at high risk for early death and poor QOL trajectory, for whom novel therapies and supportive care interventions are warranted. Higher VES-13 score is also associated with higher risk of unplanned hospitalization. Routine assessment of VES-13 and CGA has high potential for early identification of high risk patients and implementation of appropriate interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→