Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life after Exagamglogene Autotemcel in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent Beta-Thalassemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), an inherited hematological disorder which requires life-long, chronic red blood cell transfusion (RBC) and regular iron chelation therapy, has a substantial negative impact on health-related qualify of life (HRQoL). Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) is a one-time, non-viral, ex vivo CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited cell therapy in phase 3 clinical trials that has been shown to eliminate the need for RBC transfusions and achieve transfusion independence. Here, we report HRQoL data from a pre-specified interim analysis of the exa-cel CLIMB TDT-111 study. Methods: CLIMB TDT-111 is an ongoing, 24-mo, phase 3 trial of a single dose of exa-cel in patients aged 12-35 years with TDT and a history of ≥100 mL/kg/year or ≥10 U/year of packed RBC transfusions for 2 years prior to screening. Changes in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures including EuroQol Quality of Life Scale 5 dimensions 5 levels of severity (EQ-5D-5L, including descriptive system and visual analog scale [VAS]) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT, including FACT-General [FACT-G] and bone marrow transplant subscale [BMTS]) for adults and the EuroQol Quality of Life Scale 5 dimensions youth (EQ-5D-Y) and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) for adolescents were assessed through month 24 as a secondary endpoint in the trial. Data are presented as of 16 January 2023 for the 24 adults (aged ≥18-35 years) and 11 adolescents (aged ≥12 to < 18 years) who had been followed for ≥16 months after exa-cel infusion. Results: Clinically meaningful improvements, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds, were observed in all PRO measures in adults. Baseline mean EQ-5D-5L health utility US index score (n=24, mean [SD]: 0.85 [0.18]) was near the general population norm and in line with baseline scores previously reported for adult patients with TDT. By month 24, both EQ-5D-5L health utility US index scores and EQ VAS scores showed substantial improvement (mean [SD] changes at month 24 [n=15]: 0.12 [0.26] and 10.2 [20.9] points; MCIDs 0.078 and 7 to 10, respectively). FACT-G Total Score improved from baseline by month 12 and was sustained through month 24 (mean [SD] change at month 24 [n=15] 10.3 [17.0] points; MCID 3 to 7), with improvements observed in all 4 subscales (physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being). BMTS score improved by month 12 and was sustained through month 24 (mean [SD] change at month 24 [n=15] 6.8 [4.7] points; MCID 2 to 3). For adolescents, EQ VAS scores improved through month 18 (mean [SD] change from baseline 4.8 [6.1] points). Total PedsQL score improved by month 6 and was sustained through month 18 (mean [SD] change from baseline [n=7] 14.1 [9.2] points; MCID 4.36). Physical functioning and psychosocial health scores, sub-components of PedsQL, both showed sustained improvement through month 18 (mean [SD] change [n=7] 19.2 [9.1] and 11.4 [10.9] points; MCID of 6.66 and 5.30 points, respectively). Improvement in psychosocial score was observed in all 3 subscales (social, emotional, and school functioning). Conclusion: Adults and adolescents infused with exa-cel reported sustained and clinically meaningful improvements in their HRQoL, with improvements observed across different instruments and domains, including physical, emotional, social/family and functional well-being and overall health status. These results demonstrate the broad clinical benefits of exa-cel in patients with TDT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".