<i>Fighter, Worker, and Family Man: German-Jewish Men and Their Gendered Experiences in Nazi Germany, 1933–1941</i>. Sebastian Huebel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With his book Fighter, Worker, and Family Man, Sebastian Huebel provides a welcomed contribution to a burgeoning research field that increasingly focuses on Jewish men as gendered beings within the history of fascism and genocide. While the focused study of women during the Holocaust has been pertinent for some decades, attention to maleness as its own category remains largely absent. Huebel’s book began as a PhD dissertation at the University of British Columbia, and is an innovative and original study of gender and Nazi Germany. Its focus mainly lies on the marginalization of Jewish men and the Nazi attack on Jewish masculinity in the 1930s. Huebel also highlights the question of agency with regard to the men in question and rightly cautions against “overemphasizing individual agency” (p. 7). Complementing the existing gendered research on women, the author explores specific male experiences and coping strategies. In so doing, he adds to the current research on gender and the Holocaust.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".