High-throughput single-cell assay for precise measurement of the intrinsic mechanical properties and shape characteristics of red blood cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intrinsic physical and mechanical properties of red blood cells (RBCs), including their geometric and rheological characteristics, can undergo changes in various circulatory and metabolic diseases. However, clinical diagnosis using RBC biophysical phenotypes remains impractical due to the unique biconcave shape, remarkable deformability, and high heterogeneity within different subpopulations. Here, we combine the hydrodynamic mechanisms of fluid-cell interactions in micro circular tubes with a machine learning method to develop a relatively high-throughput microfluidic technology that can accurately measure the shear modulus of the membrane, viscosity, surface area, and volume of individual RBCs. The present method can detect the subtle changes of mechanical properties in various RBC components at continuum scales in response to different doses of cytoskeletal drugs. We also investigate the correlation between glycosylated hemoglobin and RBC mechanical properties. Our study develops a methodology that combines microfluidic technology and machine learning to explore the material properties of cells based on fluid-cell interactions. This approach holds promise in offering novel label-free single-cell-assay-based biophysical markers for RBCs, thereby enhancing the potential for more robust disease diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".