MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389255912 · doi:10.4000/culturemusees.11138

Mélanie Boucher, Marie Fraser & Johanne Lamoureux (dir.), 2023. Réinventer la collection. L’art et le musée au temps de l’évènementiel

2023· article· fr· W4389255912 on OpenAlexaff
Amélie Giguère

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture & Musées · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publié à un moment où l’on constate un intérêt nouveau pour les collections, notamment interrogées sous l’angle de leur légitimité, de leurs usages ou des défis de leur gestion, l’ouvrage collectif Réinventer la collection : L’art et le musée au temps de l’évènementiel constitue un apport central à la recherche sur les collections muséales. Dans l’introduction du dossier de Culture & Musées qu’il a dirigé en 2021, Daniel Jacobi demande si les collections constituent « un trésor stérile ou un...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCulture & MuséesSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207