MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Topside sounder as a most reliable instrument for the Space Weather monitoring. Short review and future perspectives.

2023· article· en· W4389271253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace weatherRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)Aerospace engineeringEngineeringGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At present, Space Weather monitoring and forecasting has taken a strong place among other methods of preventing and mitigating the consequences of natural and man-made disasters and controlling planetary environment.Despite the rapid development and widespread use of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) technologies in purposes of the ionosphere monitoring, topside sounding is not inferior in modern terms, but in many ways surpasses these technologies.It is due to the fact that topside sounder working frequencies lie within the frequency band of the eigen oscillations of the ionospheric plasma and therefore these measurements are the most accurate among all methods for measuring the parameters of space plasma.In addition, the topside sounding provides information not only in-situ, at the satellite orbit altitude, but gives opportunity to restore the whole vertical profile of electron concentration up to the altitude of the main maximum of the ionosphere [1].In the second half of the XX-th century several countries succeeded in launch of the satellites with the topside sounders onboard (Canada, USA, Soviet Union, Japan).One can find the review providing the main parameters of the majority of the launched sounders in [2].It was the time of many discoveries concerning the ionosphere, especially its structure (equatorial anomaly, main ionospheric trough et.) [3][4][5][6].Next step was the organization of the regular monitoring of the ionosphere.The first attempt was made by Soviet Union in 1987 with the launch of the Cosmos 1809 satellite commissioned by Goshydromet.The satellite and payload were almost the copy of the most successful Intercosmos-19 satellite.It was supposed to be the first in the created satellite constellation for monitoring the ionosphere and outer space, but the collapse of the Soviet Union did not allow this plan to be realized.Nevertheless, the database of the topside profiles from Intercosmos-19 and Cosmos 1809 satellites contributed to the creation of the NeQuick model [7].Now we can speak on the approaching of the new era of the Space Weather monitoring.By the end of 2023 the launch of the first two satellites "Ionosfera-M" is planned with the topside sounders onboard.It will give start to realization of the satellite constellation IONOZOND [8], which at the first stage will consist of 4 satellites.The system is commissioned by Roshydromet and Russian Academy of Sciences.The main parameters of the topside sounder and the scientific payload of the Ionosfera-M satellites will be reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207