MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Uncovering the Origins of Fast Radio Bursts Using Local Universe CHIME Discoveries

2023· article· en· W4389271601 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Mohit Bhardwaj

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsAstronomyComputer scienceUniversePhysicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are one of astronomy's greatest mysteries.These millisecond-duration radio pulses are powerful enough to be observed from distant galaxies and can probe the distribution of ionized baryons throughout the Cosmic Web.However, their origins remain a mystery owing primarily to the small sample of localized FRBs.The Canadian Hydrogen Mapping Experiment (CHIME) telescope, a transit radio interferometric array in Canada, has produced the largest FRB catalog to date.For a fraction of the cataloged bursts, we saved raw voltage data that facilitated their sky localization to sub-arcminute precision.This precision is sufficient to identify the host galaxies of local Universe CHIME FRBs (redshift z < 0.1).In this summary paper, we report on the identification of several nearby FRBs which include the two closest FRBs known to date, FRBs 20200120E and 20181030A.These local Universe bursts have constrained FRB emission mechanisms and progenitor models and have disfavoured many previously held assumptions about the population of FRBs.Finally, we use the local Universe FRBs with known hosts and derive a mean MW halo DM estimate of 32 +16-20 pc cm -3 (95% confidence limit) from a joint Bayesian analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstronomical Observations and InstrumentationFrench-language works237,207