Brief History of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology in Colombia: Milestones and Current State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
century. Since 1950s, dedicated dental clinicians from different dental schools played an important role in its inception and subsequent development. The first significant wave of progress occurred in the 1970s with the appearance of the first formally trained oral pathologists. It was sometime in the late 1980s and early 1990s that dentists Ines Velez and Benjamin Herazo had separate initiatives and created the first oral pathology postgraduate programs in Bogotá. It was in the late 80's and early 90's that dentists Ines Velez and Benjamin Herazo had their own initiatives and created the first oral pathology postgraduate programs in the city of Bogotá. A concomitant of their achievements was the establishment of the first on-site oral pathology biopsies units and registers at Colegio Odontãlogico Colombiano, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Escuela Colombiana de Medicina dental schools. The programs have trained many dentists in the field over the years and two of them remain active and fully accredited. The past and present contributions and leaderships of some academic figures and graduates have allowed a steady evolution of the specialty nationwide. Currently, the ability to manage and overcome educational and professional challenges is necessary to advance the growth of this specialty in this country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".