MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389286847 · doi:10.47941/jmlp.1555

Trade Policy and Economic Development: A Study of Trade Agreements' Effects on Developing Countries

2023· article· en· W4389286847 on OpenAlexaff
Chad Geller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Modern Law and Policy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Technological Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeveloping countryTrade and developmentDeskBusinessForeign direct investmentEmpirical researchCommercial policyInternational economicsEconomicsInvestment (military)Trade barrierInternational tradePublic economicsEconomic growthPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of trade agreements on developing countries. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to trade agreements’ effects on developing countries. Preliminary empirical review revealed that trade agreements have the potential to significantly contribute to economic development in developing countries. Positive outcomes include increased exports, GDP growth, and the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI). However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the impact of trade agreements is not uniform across all countries, and several factors influence the degree to which these agreements benefit developing nations. These factors include the quality of institutional arrangements within the agreements, the specific industries targeted for development, and the ability to manage potential negative consequences such as income inequality and environmental degradation. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Dependency theory, Export-Led Growth theory and the Institutional Economics theory may be used to anchor future studies on trade policy and economic development. This study suggested for comprehensive impact assessment, strengthening of institutional capacity, diversification of export-oriented industries, inclusive development policies, environmental safeguards, continuous monitoring and evaluation and international cooperation. Trade policy, particularly trade agreements, holds significant potential for driving economic development in developing countries. However, realizing these benefits requires careful consideration of the unique contexts and challenges faced by each country. By adopting evidence-based policies, strengthening institutions, and prioritizing inclusive and sustainable development, developing countries can harness the opportunities presented by trade agreements to promote economic growth and improve the well-being of their populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Modern Law and PolicySame topicEconomic and Technological InnovationFrench-language works237,207