PENGARUH REVITALISASI KAWASAN KRUENG DAROY TERHADAP SOSIAL EKONOMI MASYARAKAT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Krueng Daroy merupakan kawasan cagar budaya di Banda Aceh yang penting bagi sejarah Kerajaan Aceh. Namun, kualitas hidup di kawasan ini semakin memburuk seiring munculnya kawasan kumuh. Oleh karena itu, program kotaku (kota tanpa kumuh) digagas pada tahun 2020 untuk merevitalisasi kawasan tersebut guna meningkatkan daya tarik wisata. Namun demikian, dampak program revitalisasi terhadap kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat belum terukur. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dampak revitalisasi Krueng Daroy terhadap kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat, dengan fokus di Dusun Glee Gurah, Desa Seutui dan Dusun Raja Jali, Desa Lamlagang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui kuesioner yang dibagikan kepada 32 sampel. Dampak program revitalisasi dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis regresi linier sederhana pada SPSS 25. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa program revitalisasi tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat. Hal ini disebabkan oleh Pendapatan masyarakat yang awalnya meningkat dalam usaha, menurun karena pandemi Covid-19 dan pembangunan IPAL yang menutupi pintu masuk PUJASERA serta masyarakat yang terus membuang sampah ke sungai.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".