MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389295282 · doi:10.1021/acsapm.3c02209

Deep Learning Analysis of the Propagation of Stabilizing Additive Hydrolysis in a Cross-Linked Polyethylene Pipe

2023· article· en· W4389295282 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph D’Amico, Michael Grossutti, John Dutcher

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Polymer Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHydrolysisScalingActivation energyMaterials sciencePolyethylenePenetration (warfare)MoleculeChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialChromatographyOrganic chemistryMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross-linked polyethylene (PEX-a) pipe is being increasingly used for water transport and heating applications. Its long-term stability is improved through the addition of stabilizing additive molecules that protect the pipe from environmental factors such as exposure to hot water, chlorine, and UV light. We have used infrared (IR) microscopy to measure line profiles of IR spectra across the pipe wall thickness for pipes that have been exposed to recirculating hot water at different fixed temperatures T for different aging times t . To analyze this large body of data, we used a deep learning approach involving a β-variational autoencoder (β-VAE) model. The leading latent variable L1 corresponds to the hydrolysis of a stabilizing additive molecule, and we track the penetration depth δ of the hydrolysis front radially outward from the inner wall of the pipes. The radial profiles of L1 collected for different aging temperatures T and times t allow us to interpret the propagation of the hydrolysis front as a simple diffusion process for which the activation energy E a is large compared with the thermal energy k B T . In addition, we determine time scaling factors a ( T ) for the data sets collected at different temperatures T that allow us to collapse all of the data onto a master curve of δ versus scaled aging time t ′ = a ( T ) t, and to determine that an increase in the aging temperature T of 10 °C corresponds to a decrease in the aging time t by a factor of 1.8. Our results illustrate a distinct advantage of the β-VAE analysis: it provides a useful, interpretable representation of our very large data set, allowing us to achieve a detailed physical understanding of the stabilizing additive hydrolysis phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Polymer MaterialsSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207