Exploring the Effects of Virtually-Augmented Display Sizes on Users’ Spatial Memory in Smartwatches
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The small display size of the smartwatches makes it difficult to display large amounts of information on the device. Prior work explored leveraging a second device (e.g., Head-mounted displays) to extend the space where users can access large information space with virtual displays anchored on their wrists. Though researchers showed that having an additional virtual screen increased information bandwidth, little is known about the effect of virtual display sizes on users’ performance. In this paper, we examined the impact of display sizes on spatial memory, workload, and user experience to better understand the prospects of virtually-augmented displays for smartwatches. Results from a user study revealed that a 4.8 inches display size can be the “sweet spot” for the virtually-augmented displays to ensure improved spatial memory performance and better user experience with less workload. Finally, we provided a set of design guidelines focusing to display size, spatial memory, user experience, and workload for designing virtually augmented user interfaces for smartwatches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it