Policies for Continuing Education and Teacher Professional Development: a strategy of corporate neoliberal governmentality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The article problematizes the idea of teacher professional development - TPD, from the perspective of neoliberal rationality. It seeks to demonstrate how initiatives in the field of public policies drive actions toward corporate governmentality (DARDOT; LAVAL, 2016). To this end, a document produced by the UNDIME, CONSED, Fundação Carlos Chagas, and Profissão Docente in partnership with the Ministry of Education aiming to guide cities and states toward establishing professional development matrices for teachers of Basic Education from the Common National Base for the Continuing Training of K-12 Teachers. The artifact under analysis is characterized by a conception of teacher professional development centered on regulatory and self-regulation practices necessary for constructing the neoliberal subject or neo-subject. In this sense, the study identifies mentoring approach for managing continuing education and TPD, establishing action protocols for teaching work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it