MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bifurcation Analysis and Chaos Control for Prey-Predator Model With Allee Effect

2023· article· en· W4389307000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsAllee effectEquilibrium pointPeriod-doubling bifurcationApplied mathematicsBifurcationLyapunov exponentBifurcation diagramSaddle-node bifurcationTranscritical bifurcationBifurcation theoryComplex dynamicsPiecewiseHopf bifurcationControl theory (sociology)ChaoticStatistical physicsMathematical analysisNonlinear systemControl (management)Differential equationComputer sciencePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this work is to discuss the dynamics of a predator-prey dynamical system with Allee effect. The conformable fractional derivative is applied to convert the fractional derivatives which appear in the governing model into ordinary derivatives. We use the piecewise-constant approximation method to discritize the considered model. We also investigate the occurrence of positive equilibrium points. Moreover, we analyse the stability of the equilibrium point using some stability theorems. This work also explores a Neimark-Sacker bifurcation and a period-doubling bifurcation using the theory of bifurcations. The distance between the obtained equilibrium point and some closed curves is examined for various values for the considered bifurcation parameter. The chaos control is nicely analysed using the hybrid control approach. Furthermore, we present the maximum Lyapunov exponents for different values for the bifurcation parameter. Numerical simulations are utilized to ensure that the obtained theoretical results are correct. The used techniques can be applied to deal with predator-prey models in various versions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it