Isolated Endobronchial Metastasis of Breast Cancer Successfully Managed With Multimodal Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isolated endobronchial metastases of breast cancers, without other visceral metastatic involvement, are exceptional. We report here an observation of isolated endobronchial metastasis discovered 18 months after complete treatment of breast carcinoma. The endobronchial metastasis was revealed by an incoercible cough and hemoptysis. A bronchoscopy revealed a budding tumor process obstructing the right stem bronchus and a biopsy was performed. The anatomopathological and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the metastatic nature of the endobronchial tumor. The patient received treatment with palbociclib and aromatase inhibitors. Two years after radiotherapy and under hormone treatment, the patient is in complete remission of her breast cancer and endobronchial metastasis. Emerging research suggests that oligometastatic breast cancer carries a superior prognosis. We believe that patients with oligometastatic breast cancer should be treated with curative intent, including ablative therapy to all sites of disease if it can be safely accomplished. This approach may offer an additional chance for prolonged survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".