Avaliação dos componentes da sarcopenia e qualidade de vida percebida de indivíduos em hemodiálise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO Objetivos: avaliar a prevalência de sarcopenia em indivíduos com 50 anos ou mais em hemodiálise, verificar a associação entre a sarcopenia e os fatores sociodemográficos, clínicos, antropométricos, componentes da sarcopenia e qualidade de vida (QV), e correlacionar os componentes da sarcopenia com a QV. Métodos: Participaram 83 indivíduos em hemodiálise. A sarcopenia foi estabelecida segundo consenso europeu vigente. A dinamometria para determinação da força, a circunferência da panturrilha (CP) e o índice de massa muscular esquelética apendicular (IMMEA) para a obtenção da massa muscular e a velocidade de caminhada (VC) para o desempenho físico. Para QV utilizou-se WHOQOL-bref. Resultados: a prevalência de sarcopenia foi de 32,6% (CP) e 18,1% (IMMEA). Não houve associação entre a sarcopenia e QV. Tanto a força de preensão manual (r=0,25) quanto a VC (r=0,36) apresentaram correlação com domínio físico. Conclusões: a sarcopenia foi expressiva e os aspectos da funcionalidade determinam o comprometimento físico nessa população.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".