A Repeated Auction Model for Load-Aware Dynamic Resource Allocation in Multi-Access Edge Computing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-access edge computing (MEC) is one of the enabling technologies for high-performance computing at the edge of the 6 G networks, supporting high data rates and ultra-low service latency. Although MEC is a remedy to meet the growing demand for computation-intensive applications, the scarcity of resources at the MEC servers degrades its performance. Hence, effective resource management is essential; nevertheless, state-of-the-art research lacks efficient economic models to support the exponential growth of the MEC-enabled applications market. We focus on designing a MEC offloading service market based on a repeated auction model with multiple resource sellers (e.g., network operators and service providers) that compete to sell their computing resources to the offloading users. We design a computationally-efficient modified Generalized Second Price (GSP)-based algorithm that decides on pricing and resource allocation by considering the dynamic offloading requests arrival and the servers' computational workloads. Besides, we propose adaptive best-response bidding strategies for the resource sellers, satisfying the symmetric Nash equilibrium (SNE) and individual rationality properties. Finally, via intensive numerical results, we show the effectiveness of our proposed resource allocation mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it