MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389320114 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v64i2.56293

Career Decision of Recent First-generation Postsecondary Graduates at a Metropolitan Region in Canada: A Social Cognitive Career Theory Approach

2018· article· en· W4389320114 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Luis Miguel Dos Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCareer Development and Diversity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySociologyPedagogySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using social cognitive career theory by Lent, Brown and Hackett (1994), this research analyzed recent first-generation postsecondary graduates’ career perspectives and the difficulties of being first-generation graduates. The researcher found that recent first-generation postsecondary graduates in a Canadian metropolitan model their career pathway and decisions after peers with similar experiences. Also, the professional suggestions from parents were not available for both academic and career planning. This finding suggested career counselors should not only suggest career pathways to students based on their characteristics, but they should also connect their overall personal characteristics and academic majors. Earlier studies showed that students’ childhood and teenage experiences could influence their outcome expectations for career selection. S’appuyant sur la théorie cognitive-sociale de l’orientation professionnelle de Lent, Brown et Hackett (1994), cette recherche a analysé les perspectives de carrière d’étudiants ayant récemment obtenu un diplôme postsecondaire ainsi que les difficultés liées au fait d’être la première génération de diplômés du postsecondaire. Le chercheur a trouvé que les membres de la première génération de diplômés récents du postsecondaire dans une métropole canadienne orientent leur cheminement et leurs décisions professionnelles sur ceux de leurs pairs avec des expériences similaires. Il a également noté l’absence de suggestions de la part des parents relatives à la planification académique et professionnelle. Ces résultats portent à croire que les conseillers en orientation ne devraient pas se limiter à proposer des cheminements professionnels basés sur les traits des étudiants, mais devraient également tenir compte de leurs traits de caractère et de leurs spécialisation académique. Des études antérieures ont démontré que les expériences que vivent les étudiants pendant leur enfance et adolescence peuvent influencer leurs attentes de résultats quant au choix de carrière. Mots clés : orientation professionnelle, psychopédagogie, première génération de diplômés, théorie cognitive-sociale de l’orientation professionnelle, développement sain des jeunes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicCareer Development and DiversityFrench-language works237,207