MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389324412 · doi:10.61788/njn.v1i22.08

Cognitive Dysfunction in Parkinson Disease

2022· article· en· W4389324412 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N.Z. Agaeva, Shams Hasanli, R.L. Gasanov

Bibliographic record

VenueNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseNeuropsychologyCognitionParkinson's diseaseMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitive impairmentMotor symptomsPopulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryPsychologyPhysical therapyPediatricsClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson’s disease is the second most common progressive neurodegenerative disorder mainly in middle-elderly population. Particular attention is paid to the evaluation and correction of cognitive disorders among non-motor manifestations of the disease. The purpose of this scientific study was to study the features of clinical deficiency in Parkinson's disease. The study included 36 patients who underwent clinical and neurological assessment, as well as neuropsychological testing according to the MOCA and Hoehn Yahr scales. Thus, according to the results of the study, a direct correlation was found between the severity of the disease and the degree of cognitive impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGYSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207